![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Should be possible to fly up to 30 minutes at + 9lbs and 2850 RPM. Actually it is not possible to fly even at +6 1/2 lbs at 2850 RPMs for 30 minutes."
Well sort of. 30 mins is a general limit. As to be able to actually do it is subject to Oil temp and Coolant limits staying within limits. It seems the real issue in CLOD with the Merlins is keeping Oil temp below 95C. If you do this then generally there is not an issue. Go over 85C and the windscreen gets oily quickly. The Source Document (AP 1565B) is RAF Pilots notes for the Spitfire II |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LMAO, It is very realistic to use a climb rating for cruising.
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46069063/1...e-II-Aeroplane Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by 5./JG27.Farber; 05-14-2012 at 11:20 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here Last edited by VO101_Tom; 05-12-2012 at 11:06 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Chaps,
I have found the Spit IIa to be competitive with the 109. I have achieved a couple of kills and survived a couple more lengthy encounters. I have been able to make a sustained turn inside the 109 but only just. It surprised me how willingly the 109s have entered a turn fight but I'm no expert and it could have been the best tactic under the specific circumstances. I don't know whether these were experienced players. I hesitate to mention this as I really enjoy the IIa but it seems a bit of a gift that I can fly with boost on all the time at 100% throttle. It seems to be about 8lbs boost. As long as revs are kept a little lower than maximum using prop-pitch and rads are open it will not overheat. I can achieve and maintain 280 mph low and sustain a turn at around 200mph for as long as my patience lasts. Why have the realism fans not jumped up and down at this? Or am I completely wrong and I should be able to fly with the throttle through the gate all the time? I really have no agenda to support here, it's merely subjective observation. I hope there is some balance possible, and there seems some currently between the 109E4 and SpitIIa. Cheers, Septic. Last edited by ATAG_Septic; 05-12-2012 at 11:44 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to see more balance in the FM's as well with each of 3 main single engines having defined strengths & weaknesses. It's not possible to get 100% realism in the FM's but something that feels believable (i.e. fits the historical narrative of BoB) and is balanced is possible.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I enjoy having to manage the aircraft in combat and would prefer if more management was needed on both 109 and Spit. The E4 is, for me, too easy in terms of engine and flight management. Cheers, Septic. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your see hardly any advantage using boost and then cause loads of drag with rads open..
To the OP... get more lessons then |
![]() |
|
|