Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1331  
Old 05-10-2012, 01:01 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Hi Black Six i know that now it is the most important to get good performance of CLoD without CTDs ect. but i think FM aspect is also important. Checking performacne of planes in beta patch i found that it is far from RL test and not accurate. It is possible to contant or disccus it with 1C flight model programist or it is possible he take part of discussion about CLoD planes historical performacne? I think there is still many things to correct? Maby if he would come here to comunicate in these forum e.x section FM it would help in future FM changes? just thinking and asking that it would be good idea?
Reply With Quote
  #1332  
Old 05-10-2012, 01:03 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by He111 View Post
something just downloaded onto my computer when I went to run CLOD .. but I don't have the upgrade yet? Didn't seem to effect game play.

.
A Steam update? I had one the other day.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #1333  
Old 05-10-2012, 02:03 PM
Lurker_71 Lurker_71 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 52
Default

Hi BlackSix, thanks for the updates.

One question: Will the finalized patch include a proper implementation of anti aliasing?


Regards
Reply With Quote
  #1334  
Old 05-10-2012, 02:45 PM
Stublerone Stublerone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 250
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwiatek View Post
Hi Black Six i know that now it is the most important to get good performance of CLoD without CTDs ect. but i think FM aspect is also important. Checking performacne of planes in beta patch i found that it is far from RL test and not accurate. It is possible to contant or disccus it with 1C flight model programist or it is possible he take part of discussion about CLoD planes historical performacne? I think there is still many things to correct? Maby if he would come here to comunicate in these forum e.x section FM it would help in future FM changes? just thinking and asking that it would be good idea?

Sorry mate, it seems, that you not looking to other threads or the development. We have several new changes in fm, which will be hetting some fixes. So tjey are aware of fm problems. But please concentrate on the game performance at first. Nearly every thread is about fm in later posts.

Please also have a look into bugtracker! It was also stated, that the beta patch will have fm changes, but as I haven't tested the alpha, I cannot say anything about fm changes already implemented in this alpha stage. I guess, that there are not the changes listed in the beta patchnotes concerning bf109, etc.

In general, FM should be no priority for now. First, the people should be able to play.

There are threads like"incorrect performance data" where you can discuss, but not in this news thread, please!
Reply With Quote
  #1335  
Old 05-10-2012, 02:48 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stublerone View Post
Sorry mate, it seems, that you not looking to other threads or the development. We have several new changes in fm, which will be hetting some fixes. So tjey are aware of fm problems. But please concentrate on the game performance at first. Nearly every thread is about fm in later posts.

Please also have a look into bugtracker! It was also stated, that the beta patch will have fm changes, but as I haven't tested the alpha, I cannot say anything about fm changes already implemented in this alpha stage. I guess, that there are not the changes listed in the beta patchnotes concerning bf109, etc.

In general, FM should be no priority for now. First, the people should be able to play.

There are threads like"incorrect performance data" where you can discuss, but not in this news thread, please!
Alpha patch has already the FM changes, it has been written by B6 and discussed in 1000's of posts in the last week.
Reply With Quote
  #1336  
Old 05-10-2012, 02:59 PM
Stublerone Stublerone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 250
Default

That is the problem

It is simply impossible to have a structured reading session here. Everybody say thanks and good job and keep up and and and.
But no real structured informative posts. Noone looks on the topic and think about it, before writing. They are starting a thread about fm and at least 20 guys write something about graphics and their 10000 timesrepeated question for anti aliasing support in every patch!

And again, my posts today are trash again as well. Just to fight against nonsense World of Warcraft kid posts! Sorry, but when I see my own posts and how much it has to do with the game, I could cry of this waste...
Reply With Quote
  #1337  
Old 05-10-2012, 03:00 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stublerone View Post
Sorry mate, it seems, that you not looking to other threads or the development. We have several new changes in fm, which will be hetting some fixes. So tjey are aware of fm problems. But please concentrate on the game performance at first. Nearly every thread is about fm in later posts.

Please also have a look into bugtracker! It was also stated, that the beta patch will have fm changes, but as I haven't tested the alpha, I cannot say anything about fm changes already implemented in this alpha stage. I guess, that there are not the changes listed in the beta patchnotes concerning bf109, etc.

In general, FM should be no priority for now. First, the people should be able to play.

There are threads like"incorrect performance data" where you can discuss, but not in this news thread, please!
Read my post more deeply. I wrote that of course performacne of game and crash free is most important thing now. But i think also that FM programist dont take part into performacne coding but he concentrating on flight model engine. So i just got idea that he ( flight model programist) could discuss with community here about flight model and performacne of planes which for now need a lot of fixes and a lot attention. I think community has also something to offer in these area which could be helpfull for making CLoD more realistic and historical then it is now. Just my point.
Reply With Quote
  #1338  
Old 05-10-2012, 04:28 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwiatek View Post
Read my post more deeply. I wrote that of course performacne of game and crash free is most important thing now. But i think also that FM programist dont take part into performacne coding but he concentrating on flight model engine. So i just got idea that he ( flight model programist) could discuss with community here about flight model and performacne of planes which for now need a lot of fixes and a lot attention. I think community has also something to offer in these area which could be helpfull for making CLoD more realistic and historical then it is now. Just my point.
I am sure that's exactly what the fm guy wants more ludicrous info from "unbiased" armchair experts... Sigh
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #1339  
Old 05-10-2012, 04:42 PM
ATAG_MajorBorris's Avatar
ATAG_MajorBorris ATAG_MajorBorris is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
I am sure that's exactly what the fm guy wants more ludicrous info from "unbiased" armchair experts... Sigh
__________________
ASUS Sabertooth MB--Intel 2600k@4.7--EVGA GTX580 3GB--Corasir 1200 watt psu--Corsair 16gb 1866--Corsair H70 cooler--Corsair 650d case--OCZ Vertex 3--Track IR5--CH Eclipse Yoke--CH Trottle Quadrant--CH MFP--CH Rudders-MSFF2
Reply With Quote
  #1340  
Old 05-10-2012, 05:13 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
I am sure that's exactly what the fm guy wants more ludicrous info from "unbiased" armchair experts... Sigh
Well not everyone are armchairs experts but you right most of them are

Other hand still i see that 1C had problems with accurate and historical performacne of these birds
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.