Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2012, 02:59 AM
jibo jibo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 230
Default

1. it's a ALPHA patch, so please wait for the retail version before going ballistic

2. the truth, yes cod is in bad shape and will remain so, partly because of bad treatments during his infancy, the team is running out of fuel and BoM is the only way to save the company.

3. accept it or leave, no one is happy with it but it's getting utterly tiresome to hear a constant whining, there is snot all over the place.

Last edited by jibo; 05-07-2012 at 03:11 AM.
  #2  
Old 05-07-2012, 03:17 AM
Zaltor Zaltor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibo View Post
2. the truth, yes cod is in bad shape and will remain so, partly because of bad treatments during his infancy, the team is running out of fuel and BoM is the only way to save the company.
1C makes many other games dont give me that save the company crap.
  #3  
Old 05-07-2012, 04:05 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

I see the unfortunate 'turth' is still out there.

Ironic isn't it. I point out an error, the person responsible claims to have fixed it, but the 'bug' remains unrectified...
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2.
OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung.
Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous.
  #4  
Old 05-08-2012, 02:27 PM
MadTommy MadTommy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibo View Post
1. it's a ALPHA patch, so please wait for the retail version before going ballistic

2. the truth, yes cod is in bad shape and will remain so, partly because of bad treatments during his infancy, the team is running out of fuel and BoM is the only way to save the company.

3. accept it or leave, no one is happy with it but it's getting utterly tiresome to hear a constant whining, there is snot all over the place.
Very well said on points 2 & 3..after a year being patience i'm feed up. Personally I've never really had bad fps, but all the other bugs and problems and missing features have left me exasperated.

Progress feels like they have one over worked novice working on it in a basement without ventilation.

On point 1, i kept on hearing 'we won't release a patch until its right' type rhetoric, and what do we get.. an alpha patch.. all i can say to that is FFS!

I uninstalled the game yesterday.. if i had a disk of CloD i'd snap it. I'll return in 6 months.. but i won't expect anything.

Bye.
  #5  
Old 05-08-2012, 05:20 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Well Alpha or beta, its still a patch that as broken as much as its fixed like all previous patches, very shoddy work.
I don't think you understand what this patch is for Tree, that or your just being an awkward g**.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.

Last edited by JG52Krupi; 05-08-2012 at 05:25 PM.
  #6  
Old 05-08-2012, 05:20 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Tree_UK, it is not the fault of the dev team that you don't understand the purpose of a public beta test.
  #7  
Old 05-08-2012, 06:17 PM
Lensman_1 Lensman_1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 57
Default Goodbye ... but:

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Tree_UK, it is not the fault of the dev team that you don't understand the purpose of a public beta test.
Firstly, you know what? Over the last year I've seen Tree_UK do little but state the facts, accurate facts, he's nearly always proved correct eventually and yet nonetheless there's a high number of forum members who consistently attempt to undermine him and ridicule him. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Secondly, I'm almost certainly about to get banned and I really don't care because for once I'M about to tell it how it really is.

I've been a passionate devotee of the IL-2 series since the beginning over a decade ago. I've purchased every iteration, run the software on 3 different PCs, bought Track-IR, CH-Products rudder pedals and throttle and cherish my original MS Sidewinder FF stick that has been with me all that time and flown all my simulated aircraft. I've been fully committed! I watched the progress of COD (or Battle Of Britain as it was originally known) from the earliest hints of it being worked on, I valued the DVD clips in the IL-2 1946 package, I trawled the web to find updates, I had an order in place with Play.com (UK) for YEARS (literally). When the sim was finally announced I placed an order for 2 Collector's Editions at once with UBISHOP and, despite the curious lack of revealing demo clips available on the web (odd that eh?) I still couldn't wait. I bought 2 GTX-580 gpus to run COD in the promised SLI and the promised DX-11. I was a full on fan and supporter of Oleg Maddox and his astonishing project that after so many years of development was PROMISED by 1C to be a new era in personal combat flight simulation. Then the game was released and immediately there was trouble. The epilepsy filter, the defects, the lack of SLI, the lack of DX-11, the lack of campaign mode, the appalling frame rate ... as has since been fully acknowledged by the development team the application was pushed out unfinished and in a terrible state. It was nowhere near a saleable commodity, they HAD to release it to recoup funds to continue and (as they promised) quickly fix all the issues.

Many of us felt cheated by that approach because it was obviously a con. They insisted prior to release that all was well, even after release they kept quiet about the problems until forced into a corner. It's no coincidence that the only real admission of the truth of the situation was AFTER the USA release when a lot more people had been conned and a lot more money brought into the 1C (and their backers') account.

Then they made a clean start, admitted what had happened, promised to fix it fast and asked us to please stick around and let them justify our trust and our investment. That, for the moment, appealed to me and I did indeed stick around but I didn't contribute to this forum because I wanted to wait and see what happened. Please bear in mind that in the good old days of 2001 to 2005 I was very active on the IL-2 forum and you can still see my posts there. I never courted controversy and I was never banned or warned by the moderators.

So ... in the last year what has happened?
Well, this forum is now effectively a fascist state. The moderators are completely intolerant of any legitimate criticism of the parlous state of COD and ban contributors who have PAID THEIR SALARY (if they're not volunteers) and those of the dev team. I've never seem an online community so denied free speech, democracy is NOT thriving here. This does noone any good. In that time we've also had several patches, I've applied them all, that have made minor incremental changes to aspects of the sim and virtually no improvements to the underlying issues that matter, that actually affect the immersive experience of flying an aircraft in combat. Then we got to the beyond surreal point where having not even vaguely completed the application that we've all paid a considerable amount of money for and which a year ago we got a solemn promise from the team that they wouldn't rest until our investment was justified and they'd finished the game, we're told that they're working on a SEQUEL, that we'll be expected to pay for and we'd have to wait for the engine being used for that to be completed so it can be plugged into COD. The smell of rat was getting strong now.
Even then I was patient, I believed them still, I awaited the uber-patch with great interest, I genuinely believed that they could do it. Then they kept us waiting and waiting. Weeks went into months. Then there was the propoganda of it being nearly finished and producing AMAZING results that would TRANSFORM the game's playability and quality ... oh, but then that code turned out to be full of defects and actually not quite ready for release after all despite being only hours away when last they mentioned it. THEN they released the latest patch, the one that we'd been told would only be released when it was actually going to REALLY improve the application, REALLY improve the gameplay, the graphics, the sound, the framerate ... Well it didin't did it ... it made things worse mostly and that's after they'd turned OFF some graphic features to save resource.

So, David Hayward, do YOU actually understand the purpose of a public beta test? Do you realize that a beta test is supposed to be of finished, bullet proof software? That you only release it because you're certain it's the finished product BUT you want one last mass test under real world conditions to check before GUARANTEEING it's worth? I don't think that you DO understand that and I'm CERTAIN that's not what happened here. This was mid development software released under duress and it's nowhere near ready for use by the end users.

In conclusion. We were conned. We are STILL being conned. They will NOT fix this application. Do NOT fall into the trap again and purchase the so called sequel. Open your eyes people, the game is over!

I fully expect to be banned for offering this truthful and non-troll opinion. As I said, I care passionately about the IL-2 series, and I've waited a LONG time before speaking my mind but this has now got patently obviously RIDICULOUS!

Goodbye all and good luck. See you in the ROF skies I hope.

Best wishes
Phil
  #8  
Old 05-08-2012, 06:21 PM
SiThSpAwN's Avatar
SiThSpAwN SiThSpAwN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
Posts: 665
Default

We are in Alpha of the Beta Patch for the graphics engine...

Alpha Test - A trial of machinery, software, or other products carried out by a developer before a product is made available for beta testing

Beta Test - A trial of machinery, software, or other products, in the final stages of its development, carried out by a party unconnected with its development
  #9  
Old 05-08-2012, 06:27 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lensman_1 View Post
blah...blah...blah...

So, David Hayward, do YOU actually understand the purpose of a public beta test? Do you realize that a beta test is supposed to be of finished, bullet proof software?

blah...blah...blah...
If they thought it was a finished bullet proof product they would have released the patch. A public beta test is released so that the community can help find bugs. If you don't want to help find bugs you should not install a beta patch.

Bye!
  #10  
Old 05-08-2012, 06:29 PM
Fjordmonkey Fjordmonkey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Larvik, Norway
Posts: 350
Default

@Lensman_1: Asking for freedom of speech and democracy on a privately owned Internet-forum is like taking a piss in your pants during winter to stay warm. I.e. completely idiotic. It's their rules, their way, ALL the way. Technically you do have freedom of speech here, but then again, what you don't have here as in the real world is freedom from consequence.

Apart from that, you're not alone in supporting the company with procurements. You're not alone in being a fan. However, some of us have infinite amounts of patience, while others have not. And even those of us that doesn't have an infinite amount of patience (and there's a few of them), quite a few of those still at least try to contribute in a meaningful manner. The rest of the rabble are merely posting the same whines and rants over and over again. And some of the denizens of this plane of existence has taken to refuting those rants and whines as best as they can.

So you made a bad call in buying a game unseen and without knowing how it was beforehand like so many of us. Sorry, but the cake is still on your face much like it is on ours. You, like the rest of us, might have quacked up on that one, but stuff like that happens when we're blind to the dangers and blinded by both the hype and our own expectations.

Many of us will buy the sequel for the same reason as why we bought CLoD. We want a good WW2-flight/combatSIM, and this is the best shot at actually getting one. Sure, there's other WW2-flightgames out there, but none of those are even remotely worth calling a simulator in any way, shape or form.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.