Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:36 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Maybe you should only speak for yourself. Because if you want another monthly ban then I`ll help you regaining it.
lol
  #42  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:43 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Maybe you should only speak for yourself.
Exactally!

It is sad that Tree feels the need to ignore the fact that some people experiences differ from his.

Because the 'truth' is some people are experiencing big improvements!

But Tree can never acknowledge that simple truth because in doing so his purpose in life would be null n void.

All in all this patch with it's mixed bag of results is to be expected from an alpha/beta patch that was release by the devs with the sole purpose of working with customers that 'ARE' experiencing problems so they can find and fix those problem quicker..

Yet Tree and his followers conveniently ignore that simple truth and act as if this was the 'FINAL' patch release and that 1C promised everything was fixed..

It is times like these I really feel for the devs at 1C..

Talk about a loose loose situation.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #43  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:49 PM
PotNoodles PotNoodles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Roger that which leads me to belive it has more to do with thier PC than CoD
Isn't that what everyone was told when they first released this game? I don't think that washes anymore with anyone.
  #44  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:49 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Exactally!

It is sad that Tree feels the need to ignore the fact that some people experiences differ from his.

Because the 'truth' is some people are experiencing big improvements!

But Tree can never acknowledge that simple truth because in doing so his purpose in life would be null n void.

All in all this patch with it's mixed bag of results is to be expected from an alpha/beta patch that was release by the devs with the sole purpose of working with customers that 'ARE' experiencing problems so they can find and fix those problem quicker..

Yet Tree and his followers conveniently ignore that simple truth and act as if this was the 'FINAL' patch release and that 1C promised everything was fixed..

It is times like these I really feel for the devs at 1C..

Talk about a loose loose situation.
According to poll results, 50% have seen the same or worse performance.

Last edited by Tree_UK; 05-09-2012 at 03:47 PM.
  #45  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:52 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PotNoodles View Post
Isn't that what everyone was told when they first released this game? I don't think that washes anymore with anyone.
It washes just fine.. Because if it was a bug in CoD that caused the errors 'SOME' are seeing then 'EVERYONE' would be experancing the same problems. But not 'EVERYONE' is experancing the same problems, therefore there is some 'SPECIFIC' about those peooples PCs that in conjunction with CoD is causing the problem! That is why the devs decided to release this alpha/beta patch to get feedback (logs and dump files) from those people who are having problems in the hopes that they can change something in CoD to account for those issues those PCs are having
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #46  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:53 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
According to poll results, 50% have seen the same or worse performance. It took 7 months to produce that success rate.
So what part of alpha/beta patch are you still confused about?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #47  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:53 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
According to poll results, 50% have seen the same or worse performance. It took 7 months to produce that success rate.

According to this poll about 50% are getting better performance....

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...t=31780&page=6
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #48  
Old 05-06-2012, 11:05 PM
PotNoodles PotNoodles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
It washes just fine.. Because if it was a bug in CoD that caused the errors 'SOME' are seeing then 'EVERYONE' would be experancing the same problems. But not 'EVERYONE' is experancing the same problems, therefore there is some 'SPECIFIC' about those peooples PCs that in conjunction with CoD is causing the problem! That is why the devs decided to release this alpha/beta patch to get feedback (logs and dump files) from those people who are having problems in the hopes that they can change something in CoD to account for those issues those PCs are having
I never read anywhere where the Devs said they were releasing it for these reasons. Infact just last week I saw a post from Blacksix that stated they wouldn't release a patch until it did what it was supposed to do which in this case was double the FPS.

Last edited by PotNoodles; 05-06-2012 at 11:07 PM.
  #49  
Old 05-06-2012, 11:12 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
It washes just fine.. Because if it was a bug in CoD that caused the errors 'SOME' are seeing then 'EVERYONE' would be experancing the same problems. But not 'EVERYONE' is experancing the same problems, therefore there is some 'SPECIFIC' about those peooples PCs that in conjunction with CoD is causing the problem! That is why the devs decided to release this alpha/beta patch to get feedback (logs and dump files) from those people who are having problems in the hopes that they can change something in CoD to account for those issues those PCs are having
lol, oh and its 'experiencing'
  #50  
Old 05-06-2012, 11:24 PM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
lol, oh and its 'experiencing'
Now that's definitely ultra cheap to attack somebody on his or her mastery of the very complicated and not very consistant spelling of the English language particularly if this person is not a native speaker. Very cheap indeed.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.