Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:13 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
The unfortunate truth here is that no mater what 1C does there will be a group that is not happy.
What`s strange is that those are the same people that have been whining for a year now.
  #22  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:29 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
Err doesn't the beta patch contain changes to the flight model, some of which already have the Rather Annoyed Force up in arms
Yeah they're all pissed off that they won't have a plane that out-turns, out-climbs, and out-speeds the Luftwaffe any more.

Anyways, 1C have stated more than once that the flight models are wrong above 7000m and that it won't be fixed until they get more of our money.

Quote:
do not allow us to minimize the margin of error at altitudes about 7 km (21,000 ft) where most aircraft begin to perform worse than their real-life counterparts. Fixing this requires more extensive code rework and will therefore only appear with the upcoming sequel

Last edited by CaptainDoggles; 05-06-2012 at 09:43 PM.
  #23  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:39 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadTommy View Post
Very true indeed, mainly because whatever they do it is sub standard.
Case in point ^^
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #24  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:39 PM
pupaxx pupaxx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Absurdistan - Rome
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kestrel79 View Post
I going to reserve my judgement until the FINAL release version of this patch comes out.
+1...even if I become to turn pessimist
  #25  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:40 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
What`s strange is that those are the same people that have been whining for a year now.
Roger that which leads me to belive it has more to do with thier PC than CoD
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #26  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:44 PM
MB_Avro_UK MB_Avro_UK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, England (Not European!).
Posts: 755
Thumbs up

The truth is this. Made last year.



Anything else better? I think not.


Keep up thje excellent work Developers

Best Regards,
MB_Avro.
  #27  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:45 PM
Whiski Whiski is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 100
Default

Seems a bit backwards to me. If they expect more money then releasing CLoD in such a state would have a rather adverse effect on that idea.

I for one, won't be purchasing BoM, at least not until it has been out for several months and has been scrutinized by the community, or they get CLoD working as intended.

Whiskey
  #28  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:45 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Ace, even though i don't want to, i'm becoming increasingly despondent now myself.

At some point potential has to be realised into actuality.

From my point of view, i could live with everything else if the fm's were good, but they seem to be going backwards
  #29  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:45 PM
outer beacon outer beacon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Roger that which leads me to belive it has more to do with thier PC than CoD
Fair point, but how is it that 1C can't write software that runs equally well on recommended spec machines? Lots of other developers manage it quite well.

Beta patch it may be, but unfortunately it appears for most to be a step backwards. I am having more CTD now than I was was pre patch.
  #30  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:52 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fruitbat View Post
Ace, even though i don't want to, i'm becoming increasingly despondent now myself.

At some point potential has to be realised into actuality.

From my point of view, i could live with everything else if the fm's were good, but they seem to be going backwards
Don't get me wrong.. it is depressing that more of these folks can not get the CoD to work with thier systems.. That means less targets online which is bad for all of us.

But stop and remember.. This is a alpha/beta patch that 1C themselfs admited day one has issues (disabled feature) and they released it with the sole purpose of getting feedback from all the users to help them nail down the bugs faster! You know that thing alot of the whiners have been whining for.. And now they got thier chance to be part of the solution and all they way to do is sit back and pretend they didn't hear/read the part about this being an alpha/beta patch and want to pass judgement as if this was the final patch and 1C guarnteed that everything was fixxed!

In short..

What part of alpha/beta patch do these people not understand?

If you don't want to help out by reporting bugs.. than don't DL alpha/beta patches and WAIT for the FINAL patch

IT IS THAT SIMPLE!!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.