Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2012, 09:18 PM
RedToo's Avatar
RedToo RedToo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 261
Default

I'd like to read that. Do you have the reference?

RedToo.
__________________


43 Squadron.

My 'Waiting for Clodo' thread: http://tinyurl.com/bqxc9ee
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2012, 09:25 PM
MB_Avro_UK MB_Avro_UK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, England (Not European!).
Posts: 755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedToo View Post
I'd like to read that. Do you have the reference?

RedToo.
I wish I had the reference to hand. It was in a book. I'll have to search. But it was certainly a concern for many pilots that there was no end in sight to the Battle.

Best Regards,
MB_Avro.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2012, 09:30 PM
Glider Glider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 441
Default

Its an observation but I believe that the Luftwaffe considered the battle to start on the 13th August. The initial battles over the Channel were not seen as the start of the actual battle.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2012, 09:49 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

The German war machine was geared for blitzkrieg, and couldn't satisfy a long war of attrition, nor Hitler's thirst for Russia. The Battle of Britain was just a sideshow: a cinema propaganda story concocted to sell the British war effort to the USA. And US support was vital to ensure Britain could beat Germany in the longer run. As the battle stood, I imagine that Britain and Germany could have continued for a long time. Britain's war economy was much better managed (good boy Beaverbrook) but the resources we'd poured into the battle limited our capacity. With Hitler out of the equation, and perhaps tactics too, I think the Battle could have gone on for a long time. Otherwise it boils down to 'what ifs'. What if Germany hadn't switched to daylight bombing raids of cities? What if the Bf-109's were allowed on fighter sweeps? (which accounted for the most kills). etc etc

All hypothetical, really. But damned interesting.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up!

Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2012, 10:00 PM
katdogfizzow katdogfizzow is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 297
Default

Although I never read anything like that, everything was exaggerated at the time and rightfully so. Especially by pilots.

However, at the apex of the battle, certainly Dowding and upper leadership knew the RAF was just DAYS away from the RAF production rate losing the battle to the RAF attrition rate. The records were meticulously kept. DAYS! Luckily, erroneously and ironically beginning on Aug 15, 1940 the war expanded to retaliatory city attacks alleviating the pressure on radar, command centers and airfields.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2012, 10:19 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

However did the number of a/c increase during the Battle then?

Aircraft available for operations
month day total aircraft available

June
22 - 565
29 - 587

July
6 - 644
13 - 666
20 - 658
27 - 651

August
3 - 708
10 - 749
17 - 704
24 - 758
31 - 764

September
7 - 746
14 - 725
21 - 715
28 - 732

October
5 - 734
12 - 735
19 - 734
26 - 747

November
2 - 721
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-17-2012, 12:47 AM
Gabelschwanz Teufel's Avatar
Gabelschwanz Teufel Gabelschwanz Teufel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 62
Default

Pilots and infrastructure (Radar, airfields, etc.), not planes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.