![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't care how skilled they are or aren't. The issue is one of "was it realistically possible?". Obviously trim was regularly adjusted before certain actions were taken, such as dives, but this is different to making 2 or 3 degrees of movement inside 2 seconds whilst in the dive itself. From what I've read so far it appears that the trim adjustment is too fast compared with real life, therefore historically inaccurate.
@Crump. You do seem to dismiss things unless it is absolutely proven to you, possibly in the knowledge that you know that evidence to the level you require is not possible. This is why we use deduction, common sense and trim off the extreme viewpoints to gain a sensible perspective on the situation. To be honest mate, I'm not sure you are able to contribute anything to any discussion involving history because of this approach, and this becomes harder as less is known and greater speculation is required because it would never be possible to satisfy your requirements. I ask you, since you play devils advocate for this discussion, do you hold the belief that what we have now is correct? According to your logic it cannot be. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe OM and his team have spent more time evaluating the timing of the trim wheel than we did/do here and the 5 to 6 seconds we have now didn't come out of thin air.
Imo it would be feasible in that time frame, but that is irrelevant, as the actual change is not the full range anyway. That would mean we are talking about a imagined (imo) "advantage" of a few tenths of a second while actuating the trim and thereby drastically reducing the advantages in the following fight after the first seconds. This discussion would be interesting if we had somehow corrected and validated FM's, which we dont have, rendering the discussion at this time senseless.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Bobika. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you really believe that you might need a reality check.
![]() ![]() ![]() A few bugs dont devalue the rest!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
It is like having a fuel reserve of 2:1.....It does not make sense. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When there are mechanical questions to be answered, I always reach for my Haynes
![]() http://www.haynes.com/products/productID/666 http://www.haynes.com/products/sfID1/115/sfID2/125 anybody have one?
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 Last edited by SlipBall; 04-10-2012 at 10:45 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Don't know how many turns or what starting position that was from though. But judging from the paint chips on certain parts of the wheel only appearing once, I'd say that was not even a full revolution. Last edited by irR4tiOn4L; 04-11-2012 at 02:45 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It looks like the original assumption was correct and this is not correctly represented in the sim at the moment. The problem is with other a/c, too (and their rather too swift and easy elevator trim response) but the plane benefiting from this fact the most (due to RL vs. sim discrepancies) is the 109.
__________________
Bobika. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was being ironic, robtek
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Anyway Crumpp, next time you fly your 109, would you be so kind and report back to us how it really works? ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Bobika. |
![]() |
|
|