Friday Update, March 30, 2012 - Page 15

Ventus · #**141** 03-31-2012, 10:02 AM

My best pleasure it will be to PLAY with this game and encourage dev team (i respect all the work they are do for us : simmers)

I just say that this lasts pics are not a quality of COD but seems to be il2 1946 (specialy winters pics).

The game itself, in its roots, is very imperfect....that's why devs make a patch... no?

Finally i think the friday updates pics must be in relation with the patch and not for other add-on (refer to the friday update with the only tank, ok it was beautyful)

Thank's for the next patch,

flyingblind · #**142** 03-31-2012, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo'bar

MG is a victim of their own quality. Today we see that 46's quality was far ahead. What they've done is to keep all positive aspects from FB/46 and put more details into it.

That's why today's screenshots look very similar to old ones. But if you'd take a closer look you'll see the difference. And if you'd think twice you'd realize that there's much more work required to make a very good product even better.

That is exactly right. Visually the differences appear quite superficial at first glance but on closer inspection they are in a different league. Just look at a cannon barrel and compare it with ones in IL2 1946. The latter is quite 2D, flat and crude in comparison. The cockpits speak for themselves. The landscape is also limited by the computer resources needed to render it. You just cannot have 100% real landscape and still play the game. The biggest advances will be the ones you cannot see under the hood.

von Pilsner · #**143** 03-31-2012, 10:24 AM

Thanks for the update - good luck with the particle stutters...

Crescendo69 · #**144** 03-31-2012, 10:35 AM

Good Luck !!

senseispcc · #**145** 03-31-2012, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackSix

Good day everyone!

We know that none of you can really share our joy yet, and Cliffs of Dover is all you have at the moment. We have discussed at length whether we should even be talking about the future while our present is in the state it’s in. Dissension notwithstanding, we did decide that some extra glimmer of hope is better than complete silence. The last thing we want is for an extra segment of the community to start complaining that we’ve stopped showing our Eastern Front content as well.

I did buy the orirganl IL2 because the name was IL2 and I coud hope to fly a ..IL and other Soviet planes. I shall wait and hope thank's a lot.

Continu0 · #**146** 03-31-2012, 03:54 PM

Just noticed

THE AA IS WORKING

in those Screenshots!

Luftwaffepilot · #**147** 03-31-2012, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Continu0

Just noticed

THE AA IS WORKING

in those Screenshots!

Is it? To me it still looks jaggy

Thee_oddball · #**148** 03-31-2012, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flyingblind

That is exactly right. Visually the differences appear quite superficial at first glance but on closer inspection they are in a different league. Just look at a cannon barrel and compare it with ones in IL2 1946. The latter is quite 2D, flat and crude in comparison. The cockpits speak for themselves. The landscape is also limited by the computer resources needed to render it. You just cannot have 100% real landscape and still play the game. The biggest advances will be the ones you cannot see under the hood.

Dont be silly...of course you can have %100 real....it just requirres a Xeon12 a 4 way SLI (7950 3 GB) and 32 GB or ram

addman · #**149** 03-31-2012, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thee_oddball

Dont be silly...of course you can have %100 real....it just requirres a Xeon12 a 4 way SLI (7950 3 GB) and 32 GB or ram

Now that picture should be on the "recommended system requirement" on the DVD case.

No145_Hatter · #**150** 03-31-2012, 05:11 PM

Thanks for the honest update.