Cliffs of Dover, a Year Later

[Chivas]

Falstaff you obviously know very little about how complicated this development is, but the sad part is you don't have enough common sense to figure it out.

Chivas said, again:

>>Falstaff you obviously know very little about how complicated this development is, <<

I have an idea. Would you like to discuss core run-times, memoring handling and paging, asset libraries, DLLs or equivalents, optimisation, de-bugging?

Which of the above? Or the work-flow? The goals? The short-term? The inter-linked parts? The bug-fixing, stripping, occasional assembler routines, graphics card sub--routines and calls, hot-fixes? Project management? Time-scales, Scaleability? Funding? Contract nuances and penalities?

Enlighten me.

Granted, I'm going back a bit since I was involved but I bet the underlying principles are the same.

You?

>>but the sad part is you don't have enough common sense to figure it out. <<

So tell me, what commonsense is required? What don't I understand? Where do the specific conundrums lie, Yoda?

You're floundering, and still full of it.

Ben

>>Read his posts. <<

I have. I'm still at a loss.

And you're still piggy-backing his posts, having apparently lost faith in your own.

Ben

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Falstaff

>>Read his posts. <<

I have. I'm still at a loss.

I know. That makes it even better.

David Hayward said:

>>I know. That makes it even better. <<

Of course it does, love.

[Chivas]

Falstaff you don't have enough common sense to make any knowledge you may or may not have worth while.