![]() |
#931
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
|
#932
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to be cynical, but this place is turning from a boring place to an highly entertaining arena. 1C should sell the tickets.
|
#933
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That may be true DroopSnoot, I just see negative statements like this to be unnecessary and potentially damaging to the way visitors to the forum perceive the product. "the time has come now for the buyers to choose whether or not they will offer their continuing support" "the more you're put off supporting the team" Why even talk about cutting support for the developer when we haven't even seen what they've been working hard to deliver these past months? At least give them the chance to rectify things. |
#934
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#935
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Regards, Sam. |
#936
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you direct me to the post in which Luthieer/BlackSix said so?
|
#937
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't think people need to be lectured to offer support. If a new customer came here, unsatisfied with the product, and had the developer post a Banjo video, they would be pretty annoyed. You have to be a long-term member to see the humour; so if we are to assume the team are catering for the long term members, and the long term members are now getting annoyed.... it's a tricky situation. I promote what I've always said before: a topic may have a few negative posts, but if left in isolation they are harmless. If they get expanded into 20 page topics, it's then that the aggression, flaming, nastiness comes out. From all sides.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up! Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9 |
#938
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I admit that following the daily Heroes against Cerberus and his pets is really amusing, but it's decreasing my productivity as worker. ![]()
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
#939
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hm, we could do with a "like" function on this forum.
|
#940
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't get it...if I can go on-line and really enjoy it, why can't others with better system than me
![]()
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
![]() |
|
|