Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:53 PM
baldeagle72 baldeagle72 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Default

Is there a way you could create a night fighter version of the Me-110 with the radar antenna on the front, and slanting music cannons firing up at an angle?
Plus there is the He-219 night fighter that would be great at night too...
Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 03-10-2012, 12:04 AM
baldeagle72 baldeagle72 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Default

Is there a way you could create a night fighter version of the Me-110G-4/R3 for us?
It would have the option of the "slanting music" of two 20mm MG FF cannon firing up at an angle from the fuselage aft of the cockpit... plus the Radar antennas would show too.
Then there's the need for the most deadly night fighter made in WW II... the He-219B-3
These two aircraft would complete the night fighter capability in IL2-1946... Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 03-10-2012, 12:57 AM
daidalos.team daidalos.team is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 187
Default

Hello,

You can expect the Bf 110 night fighter in our future patches along side more night fighter features. He 219 is not planned.
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 03-10-2012, 02:18 AM
Kittle's Avatar
Kittle Kittle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bath, Maine. USA
Posts: 110
Default

I am curious to know if you have night fighters from other nations planned as well? The Beaufighter and Mosquito have obvious potential. The one purpose built NF for the USA was the P-61, which won't make the game. Perhaps the night fighting version of the F4U? The P-70 (A-20 variant) would make a nice addition as well.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 03-10-2012, 08:53 AM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

Corsair and Hellcat NF versions are out for the same reasons as the P-61.
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 03-10-2012, 10:45 AM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

Are there any plans to re-texture the oldest and ugliest-looking cockpits, especially the Bf 109 series? Tx in advance
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 03-10-2012, 12:24 PM
jermin jermin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

+1
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves
regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place?


Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 03-10-2012, 05:01 PM
Kittle's Avatar
Kittle Kittle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bath, Maine. USA
Posts: 110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
Corsair and Hellcat NF versions are out for the same reasons as the P-61.
I wasn't aware that Vought was bought out by the folks that are now NG. That sucks. That eliminates every single night fighter the USN fielded in WWII. I guess the only US night fighter left is the P-70. Have to admit, an A-20 with 20mm gun packs on the sides is an attractive thought.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 03-10-2012, 07:48 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

guys, I don't know if this has been proposed or it's in the plans already, but have you thought about a general revamp of the effects i.e. smoke, tracers, explosions etc? That would add SO much to your work and would definitely revamp things!
Also fixing 3d models and FMs of at least the most popular planes (i.e. FW190 and Bf109), there's a lot of outstanding work that has been done with mods, I'm sure that if you could implement these improvements you'd do a great job with it!
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 03-11-2012, 10:14 AM
Pips Pips is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canberra ACT
Posts: 55
Default

Any chance of a de Havilland Hornet being developed in a future patch? I've been in love with this aircraft for years, and flying the Mossie (good as it is) just doesn't do it for me anymore. The Hornet would provide a nice balance against the later German aircraft such as the Do 335 and the Ta 152.

Like the F7F Tigercat, the Hornet really was a supreme example of twin-engined power; and could just about hold it's own (if flown correctly) against any aircraft of the WWII era. Additionally it also was developed for carrier use - a nice addition for the FAA. Here's some info on it's peformance figures against contemporary challenges.

Hornet F.1
Speed sea level: 392mph
Speed at altitude: 472 @ 22,000ft
Initial climb: 4,650ft/min
Normal range: 1,710 miles/with drop tanks 'no data'

Spitfire XIV
Speed sea level: 375 mph
Speed at altitude: 448 mph @ 26,000ft
Initial climb: 4,580ft/min
Normal range: 460 miles/with drop tanks 850 miles

Tempest V
Speed sea level: 392 mph
Speed at altitude: 435 mph @ 17,000ft
Initial climb: 4,700ft/min
Normal range: 740 miles/with drop tanks 1,450 miles

P-47D-22
Speed @ 5,000ft: 363 mph
Speed at altitude: 435 mph @ 30,000ft
Initial climb: 3,120ft/min
Normal range: 475 miles/ with drop tanks 1,250 miles

P-51D-NA
Speed @ 5,000ft: 395 mph
Speed at altitude: 437 mph @ 25,000ft
Initial climb: 3,475ft/min
Normal range: 850 miles/ with drop tanks 1650 miles

F7F
Speed sea level: 366 mph
Speed at altitude: 434 mph @ 22,200ft
Initial climb: 4,530ft/min
Normal range: 1,200 miles/ with drop tanks 'no data'

Do 335A-1
Speed sea level: no data
Speed at altitude: 474 mph @ 21,325ft
Initial climb: no data
Normal range: 1,280 miles/with drop tanks 'no data'

Fw 190D-9
Speed sea level: 357 mph
Speed at altitude: 426 mph @ 21,654ft
Initial climb: 3,120ft/min
Normal range: 520 miles/with drop tanks 'no data'

Ta 152H-1
Speed sea level: 357 mph
Speed at altitude: 465 mph @ 29,860ft
Initial climb: 3,445ft/min
Normal range: 755 miles/with drop tanks 1250 miles

Me 109K-4
Speed sea level: 378 mph
Speed at altitude: 452 mph @ 19,685ft
Initial climb: 4,820ft/min
Normal range: 366 miles/with drop tanks 635 miles

And to finish off I can't think of a better way than with some words from Eric 'Winkle' Brown, who was very impressed with the Hornet. Note that Eric is discussing the performance of the Sea Hornet, which was some 800 kg heavier than the F.1.

"...the next two months of handling and deck landing assessment trials were to be an absolute joy; from the outset the Sea Hornet was a winner!" "The view from the cockpit, positioned right forward in the nose beneath a one-piece aft-sliding canopy was truly magnificent. The Sea Hornet was easy to taxi, with powerful brakes... the takeoff using 25 lb (2,053 mm Hg, 51" Hg) boost and flaps at one-third extension was remarkable! The 2,070 hp (1,540 kW) Merlin 130/131 engines fitted to the prototypes were to be derated to 18 lb (1,691 Hg, 37" Hg) boost and 2,030 hp (1,510 kW) as Merlin 133/134s in production Sea Hornets, but takeoff performance was to remain fantastic. Climb with 18 lb boost exceeded 4,000 ft/min (20.32 m/sec)"... "In level flight the Sea Hornet's stability about all axes was just satisfactory, characteristic, of course, of a good day interceptor fighter. Its stalling characteristics were innocuous, with a fair amount of elevator buffeting and aileron twitching preceding the actual stall"... "For aerobatics the Sea Hornet was absolute bliss. The excess of power was such that manoeuvres in the vertical plane can only be described as rocket like. Even with one propeller feathered the Hornet could loop with the best single-engine fighter, and its aerodynamic cleanliness was such that I delighted in its demonstration by diving with both engines at full bore and feathering both propellers before pulling up into a loop!"

And

"Landings aboard Ocean had been made without any crash barrier... Yet, in the case of the Sea Hornet, I had felt such absolute confidence that I was mentally relaxed... Indeed, there was something about the Sea Hornet that made me feel that I had total mastery of it; I revelled in its sleek form and the immense surge of power always to hand..." "Circumstances had conspired against the Sea Hornet in obtaining the recognition that it justly deserved as a truly outstanding warplane...in my book the Sea Hornet ranks second to none for harmony of control, performance characteristics and, perhaps most important, in inspiring confidence in its pilot. For sheer exhilarating flying enjoyment, no aircraft has ever made a deeper impression on me than did this outstanding filly from the de Havilland stable."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.