Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: When will the next beta patch be released?
thursday!!! 1 0.74%
this friday 18 13.24%
during next week 15 11.03%
during the week after the next week 12 8.82%
in three weeks 9 6.62%
after a month 12 8.82%
two months 2 1.47%
three months 5 3.68%
this year, hopefully.. 20 14.71%
in two weeks 42 30.88%
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1151  
Old 01-21-2012, 06:33 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Besides whining and negative criticism, you know what else kills game? Releasing something that is half finished.
Right we have that part clear now....whining kills games.

Now as an extra lesson I'll tell you what fixes games with problems........developers, particularily ones who do their job instead of appeasing spoiled brats.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #1152  
Old 01-21-2012, 06:40 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post
And yet Luthier gives a clear road map about what they're trying to fix/not fix at the current moment and you're the first to chime in about something not immediately relevent to the upadate like Anistropic Filtering. You expect us to believe that you wouldn't complain about being beta testers for an incomplete project had they been forth coming?
does this road map say when the FM, DM, CEM, AI, crashes and sound will be fixed?

How much so far on that road map has been fixed?
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
  #1153  
Old 01-21-2012, 06:45 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
does this road map say when the FM, DM, CEM, AI, crashes and sound will be fixed?

How much so far on that road map has been fixed?
Fixed?.....no, nothings ever fixed with games, improved?......yes by comparisson to release, when the next patch is released we will see more improvement, I don't think you will ever find anyone that will give you a fixed date on when a patch will be done for any game.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #1154  
Old 01-21-2012, 06:51 PM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
does this road map say when the FM, DM, CEM, AI, crashes and sound will be fixed?

How much so far on that road map has been fixed?
I rest my case. You're looking at the wrong map. You also avoided my comment about whining regarding what's not included in an update. You or I my not like the road map or progress of the sim, but if the map points to one place (nevermind how small the distance is) it is a plan. Asking why we're not farther along matters not one bit.



Don't get me totally wrong, furbs. There are those on the other side of the fence who are just as vehement as you are and don't add significantly to the overall forum atmosphere. We all know the game's not perfect....

I chalk it up to being disappointed after a long protracted build of CoD. I understand that. But there has to be a point where folks realize that kvetching or over abundant praise helps no one.

I think the moderators are trying to reach that medium. Unfortunately it has come to moderation of posts and topics... including banning of members.
  #1155  
Old 01-21-2012, 06:52 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Ok lets say when will the features work as intended?
When it's done.....at some point in the future........when the process of fixing the code has been accomplished..........when the devs are satisfied with the results
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #1156  
Old 01-21-2012, 07:04 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Think i might fill up with a few planes too. price of a lunch.
I will as well. I am shy like 2 planes.
  #1157  
Old 01-21-2012, 07:18 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

Its amazing how quickly people forgot the problems ROF had on release. It certainly wasn't released as unfinished as COD, but it was also not as complex. There is very little money in the prop genre and only dedicated flight sim people, like the ROF, and COD teams are still in the business. I'll have to remember to add a few more aircraft to my ROF install. I don't fly it much as I simply don't like the claustrophobic feel of that top wing.

Its also amazing that there are people who think that because someone says something good about COD that they are in denial about the problem that exist, and are hurting the genre. I'm not aware of anyone in the forums who thinks and posts that the sim doesn't need any work. I guess they figure the developer will think we must love the sim they way it is, and won't bother trying to fixing it. I'm quite sure the developer isn't impaired with that logic.

What the development have achieved so far is a mixed bag, that is indicative of any sim released unfinished. The current state of COD, has required years of work, and is a strong base to achieve a very good combat flight sim. As long as they keep working, I'm quite willing to support them. Its just a fact of life that todays combat flight sims are just too complex, expensive, and time consuming, for a small enthusiast developer to handle on time and on budget.

Yes, we could express the argument, that what was released took to long, and wasn't what we expected, but everyone is aware of that.....its time we got over it, and moved on to something else, or stay and support the development with constructive feedback.
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8
Asus PT6 Motherboard
6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600
Asus GTX580 Direct CU II
60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it
500gig HD Dual Boot
Samsung 32"LG 120hz
MSFF2 Joystick
Cougar Throttle
Saitek Pro Rudder pedals
Voice Activation Controls
Track IR 5 ProClip
  #1158  
Old 01-21-2012, 07:20 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post
I rest my case. You're looking at the wrong map. You also avoided my comment about whining regarding what's not included in an update. You or I my not like the road map or progress of the sim, but if the map points to one place (nevermind how small the distance is) it is a plan. Asking why we're not farther along matters not one bit.



Don't get me totally wrong, furbs. There are those on the other side of the fence who are just as vehement as you are and don't add significantly to the overall forum atmosphere. We all know the game's not perfect....

I chalk it up to being disappointed after a long protracted build of CoD. I understand that. But there has to be a point where folks realize that kvetching or over abundant praise helps no one.

I think the moderators are trying to reach that medium. Unfortunately it has come to moderation of posts and topics... including banning of members.
Yep agreed robtek, just as the "nothing wrong with the sim and your not allowed to say anything bad about it" crowd wind me and others up. i dont ask people not to post how much they enjoy it and are happy with it.

about the FSAA, how many times have i and other people asked? all i want is a straight answer.

i dont mind if you or anyone else dont believe me robtek but my earlier post IS how i feel.

ive spent 1500 quid on a PC on the stories we was told about CLOD and how it would be.



All i see is smoke and mirrors, patch padding, no fixes and a sim that has failed so far.
I hope it gets fixed, i hope CLOD one day represents the battle of its name and not "air quake lone wolf engagement over the coast"

Im going to stop the tit for tat posting but im not going to stop posting my opinion because i hope Luthier reads these forums, though i doubt that too.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
  #1159  
Old 01-21-2012, 07:24 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Yep agreed robtek, just as the "nothing wrong with the sim and your not allowed to say anything bad about it"

These people are a fiction, never seen a single post by anyone here saying theres nothing wrong.

Quote:
ive spent 1500 quid on a PC on the stories we was told about CLOD and how it would be.
you did what?
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #1160  
Old 01-21-2012, 07:58 PM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

We all know Wargaming.net, a developer of World of tanks, World of Battleships and World of Warplanes, a relatively rich company.

In 2009 they released a strategy game called Order of War. In 2010 they switched all their attention to World of Tanks and stopped supporting it. By Jan. 2011 the game and forum was dead no patches planned.

Game Being Abandoned by fans because of memory bugs

This is how this business works nowadays. They can not prove to investors that it is financially feasible to support a 1.5-year old product.

This is what luthier probably means when he says that they decided to support the product unlike other companies. This also means they managed to persuade investors to do so. Very good news so far. They need our support to persuade investors again next month and then again and again till CloD bugs are fixed and BoM is released to pay the investors back. Cursing the devs would only harm this regular persuasion process.

Last edited by Ataros; 01-21-2012 at 08:02 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.