![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: When will the next beta patch be released? | |||
thursday!!! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 0.74% |
this friday ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 13.24% |
during next week ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 11.03% |
during the week after the next week |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 8.82% |
in three weeks |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 6.62% |
after a month |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 8.82% |
two months |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.47% |
three months |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.68% |
this year, hopefully.. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 14.71% |
in two weeks ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
42 | 30.88% |
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Aces, you're taking it too far. Lawsuits? No-one is going to take 1C to court based on Oleg and Luthier's posts on this forum.
But you weren't around when those posts were made. If you bought the game based on the website and the box, then of course (as a customer) you don't have many reasons to grumble about content. But as a forum member who was frequently in contact with Oleg and saw his posts about what would be included in the game, then one would have every-reason to feel misled. When I was talking to Oleg privately about the flight-kit modelled in the game, he told me that all my criticisms would be taken on board (following revision they did following information I sent them). This never happened. I won't grumble about something so petty, but it's quite symbolical of the way this game turned out. You can sit there telling people they are wrong to think a certain way in as many forms as you wish. The truth is that people did buy the game based on the aforementioned, and the truth is that a lot of fans felt let-down. You can't escape this. What I don't understand, though, is the need for people to prove this to you. Why would a lot of people lie about their motives for purchasing the game? Oleg's posts may have been taken too seriously, but until the announcement he was stepping down he was tangibly related to the game. It seemed official enough.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up! Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
Calm and rational is the way to do it, as above. The game itself in its present state says enough. Ultimately the more vociferous defender-of-the-faith fans must deal with that, and not the critics. No amount of pretending one is the other is going to achieve anything. The various game modules have an uncanny way of popping up and saying' sorry, I dont work just yet' depsite what the faithful defenders may say. The problem is, it's still a dawn chorus. Ben |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Agreed 100%
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 01-20-2012 at 04:43 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Well it was the same in the IL2 Series, years of research and direct contact but nothing corrected or added after many e-mails with aircraft data in black and white from the manufacturer, the Russian data was the data they were sticking with, (the FW 190A8 with the Stuka prop data was the funniest though), and still we have aircraft not reaching altitude performance figures after 10 years of the same old stuff. It's a waste of time unless there's complete public outcry unfortunately nothings listened to it would seem. Chin up though it will soon be all fixed. ![]() Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 01-20-2012 at 04:50 PM. |
![]() |
|
|