Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Server set loadouts!
Leave it alone! 79 52.67%
Allow custom setups to be generated and enforced by the server mods 47 31.33%
I don't care! 24 16.00%
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-11-2012, 08:00 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verhängnis View Post
Pegasus is right though...
Not really it just sounds like he hasn't found the right server... No ones fault but his.

If you don't like a servers rules don't play on that server.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-11-2012, 12:27 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

I've gone with "Allow it" because I would be happy to have it in a properly researched historical battle for a special mission.

I wouldn't want it for every day servers and I think people would vote with their feet if it was introduced there.

My gut feeling is the the devs won't bother with it, at least not until the have some free time which is a long way off.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-11-2012, 12:40 PM
Fjordmonkey Fjordmonkey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Larvik, Norway
Posts: 350
Default

To be honest, I don't care either way. Just because someone has loaded his guns with the best ammo out there doesn't mean that he's any good. True, he might get lucky, but meh. He can still be shot down regardless.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-11-2012, 08:20 PM
EAF331 Starfire's Avatar
EAF331 Starfire EAF331 Starfire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch View Post
I voted for 'leave it alone'.

If we take this to it's end point, so that all machine guns have ball ammo only and no cannons are allowed, what's next?


The server dictates fuel load I presume, so that everyone takes off with full tanks?


The bombers only get a certain bomb loadout?

Cheers.
Your vote is alright for me as long as I can be allowed to disagreee.

We are free to choose server. The servers are free to choose limitations.


I want the right to have the servers to have the ability to enforce realisme.

Personally I think a smaller map should enforce a smaller fuelload to enforce a healthy engine management if pilots want loiter time.

It would also be nice for a server to be able to restrict the user of De Wilde ammo. Not completely but just to reflect a the limit availability during the first part of the battle of Britten.

I see a lot of oppotunities to prolong gameplay and enhanced realisme.
__________________
Windows 7 Pro 64 bit EN
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3GHz), 8GB RAM
ATI 7970, Intel X-25M SSD


EAF331 are recruting.
We are a nordic Sqd (Norway, Sweeden, Finland, Denmark) within European Airforce. www.europeanaf.org . Please pm me if you are interested.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 01-11-2012, 08:55 PM
Auger73 Auger73 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 17
Default

I don't see what the issue is, as a server option. Let the server admin use it if they want to, or not.

It should be easy to implement, and would allow for some custom scenarios.

I think it's good for the game to have a mix of servers for people to play on - some like it more realistic, and some more arcadish.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 01-13-2012, 04:04 PM
Krt_Bong Krt_Bong is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 169
Default

I don't want to get stuck with a load of clay rounds in my Spit while the 109's get exploding rounds. I have had to go through each aircraft and set up Tracer-Ball-Incin-AP on the outside Guns and AP-Ball-Incin on all the others and this set-up works and isn't entirely wrong. If a Server want's to enforce something to keep load-outs from being abused fine, but I want fair warning and a list of what is allowable.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 01-13-2012, 07:56 PM
ATAG_Doc ATAG_Doc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: A brothel in the Mekong Delta
Posts: 1,546
Default

I find out almost on a nightly basis that even though I think I have the best load out it doesn't do any good when someone is on my rear-end shooting at me first LOL
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 01-13-2012, 09:01 PM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krt_Bong View Post
AP-Ball-Incin on all the others and this set-up works and isn't entirely wrong.
Is ball ammo better than AP in game in any way? Isn't it more efficient to have AP-AP-Inc.?

IRL cost of AP was higher I assume.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 01-13-2012, 10:56 PM
Sven Sven is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Netherlands, Zeeland
Posts: 787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fjordmonkey View Post
To be honest, I don't care either way. Just because someone has loaded his guns with the best ammo out there doesn't mean that he's any good. True, he might get lucky, but meh. He can still be shot down regardless.
That's not the point, this is a sim. This simulator simulates the battle of England, and therefore I would like to see historical load-outs. It's great for experimenting and all that, and do what you like with it, but not on my server. If I had a server, I would want to lock a certain belting for every player to make it a full real server ( at least as far as we can be realistic in this game ).
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 01-14-2012, 02:07 AM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven View Post
That's not the point, this is a sim.
If I had a server, I would want to lock a certain belting for every player to make it a full real server ( at least as far as we can be realistic in this game ).
So what 'certain belting' would you give each specific aircraft to make it 'full real' in your view?
For sake of argument, let's say it's 30 red and 30 blue, fighters only.
Please let me know, gun by gun, bullet by bullet.

But how many of each specific mark of aircraft available in the game would you allocate to each side for a given specific date during the Battle of Britain out of the same 60? This would of course have a significant impact on ammo loadouts also.

Please quote your sources of reference for making both the ammo loadouts and ratio of aircraft available 'full real' for a given date during the Battle.

I'll be particularly interested in your 'full real' ammo loadouts for the Italian aircraft involved in the Battle of Britain. Although the dates are somewhat limited for these.

Your final comment in parentheses says it all. This cannot be a 'full real' sim of the Battle of Britain, it can only be a game due to the restrictions of our computers and the number of players available.
Command and Control is somewhat limited also.

This whole loadout discussion isn't about 'full reality' or 'sims', it's about whether blue team has an advantage over red team, or vice versa, in a game.

I'd still be interested in your loadouts however.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.