Friday Update, Q&A - December 23, 2011

[norulz]

Originally Posted by BlackSix

2.Will you reenable cockpit shake that existed in the earlier versions?

Sorry... I just laughed my exhaust off. I hope "the fans" will not ask for new planes... heck... we might lose the Spitfire and 109........

[Insuber]

Originally Posted by norulz

Sorry... I just laughed my exhaust off. I hope "the fans" will not ask for new planes... heck... we might lose the Spitfire and 109........

He meant that the fans requested to remove the shaking, which was present in the release. Not the other way round ...

[BaronBonBaron]

Originally Posted by norulz

Sorry... I just laughed my exhaust off. I hope "the fans" will not ask for new planes... heck... we might lose the Spitfire and 109........

[addman]

Originally Posted by norulz

Sorry... I just laughed my exhaust off. I hope "the fans" will not ask for new planes... heck... we might lose the Spitfire and 109........

LOL! Yeah, better stop "whining" ASAP.

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by HamishUK

What's naive about the facts? Please enlighten me as I fail to see where I have been naive in voicing my dissapointment on how CloD is not being expanded on based on Luthier's post.

This mainly

Originally Posted by HamishUK

The 'community' should not have to 'create' stuff to sort out 1C's issues.

But others had a go at explaining and you didn't agree so not much point.

[HamishUK]

Originally Posted by Insuber

Your point that the community should not create objects, maps or missions with the planned SDK, only because you want 1C to deal with their issues alone, is laughable and childish. Of course MG must fix the game engine and other proprietary portions, such as FM and DM. But when this game will be completely fixed it will provide a lot of room for third party add ons, free or rentable. This was the original plan of Oleg, right after the experience of Il2.

Cheers,
Ins.

You have taken my point completely out of context.

I never said the community 'should not create using the planned SDK' at all. I said the community should not have to create stuff to fix 'issues'. Re-read what I said rather than placing your own spin on it. There is nothing childish or laughable about wanting a solid product released.

The point is that whilst I totally agree that SDK is a good thing long term 1C could technically have supported making more aircraft models etc for longer just as they did with IL2 long before Daidalos appeared. Why is that childish or laughable?

Like you I have followed the IL2 series since it's Demo nearly 10 years ago. I am perfectly entitles to air my grievances just as the fans can also lavish praise. Get a grip sunshine.

[HamishUK]

Originally Posted by Osprey

This mainly


But others had a go at explaining and you didn't agree so not much point.

Nothing naive about that...I offered my opinion on the subject. I could say 'naive' to all for putting up with something poor for over 8 months and then accepting that you will have to pay for certain elements (BoM) that should have been in the game in the first place.

That said this is the only decent WWII sim out there and I have faith that it will be resolved.

Just dissapointed that it has become a sandbox very early on (or not in this case) than further developer support on kit in the game.

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by HamishUK

Nothing naive about that...I offered my opinion on the subject. I could say 'naive' to all for putting up with something poor for over 8 months and then accepting that you will have to pay for certain elements (BoM) that should have been in the game in the first place.

That said this is the only decent WWII sim out there and I have faith that it will be resolved.

Just dissapointed that it has become a sandbox very early on (or not in this case) than further developer support on kit in the game.

BOM has nothing to do with the BOB, why should it have been included?

[HamishUK]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

BOM has nothing to do with the BOB, why should it have been included?

Have you been living in a dark hole? Because they are already in CloD, because they were heavily discussed in developer posts by Oleg prior to CloD's release and because 1C have realised they have bitten off more than they can chew in getting CloD engine up to scratch so they have been downgraded in priority and shifted to BoM that will use the new 'updated' engine from scratch.

Welcome to the forum.

[Verhängnis]

Trololol, well said Hamish.