Friday Update - December 9, 2011

[addman]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Based on the 1C track record..

CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release.

That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps

If that's the case then I'm a happy camper.

[ATAG_Snapper]

Originally Posted by Insuber

I suggest that negative people takes a breath, count till 100 and then refrain from posting their useless BS. Where BS is not our dear friend from Moskov.

+2

[MD_Titus]

if battle of moscow is a standalone game rather than an add on, where you can't play online and go from the channel to the steppes with a map switch, then i will eat a hand full of bhut jolokias and post pictures of my weeping.

[SIDWULF]

Ilya seems like a good guy with a great personality. The negativity is incredible here. IL2 Cliffs of Dover is visually and technically excellent. And the problems you speak of are far from deal breakers. I think people spend to much time posting here and not enough acctually playing the game to have an idea about what they are talking about.

[philip.ed]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Based on the 1C track record..

CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release.

That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps

Aye, but will support for the BoB aspect continue? As it stands, it's arguably the most inferior off-line representation of Battle of Britain on the market (in terms of air-combat-simulation). There is nothing that immerses you in the battle. It's not a simulation; it's a technical representation. I seriously hope this game manifests (offline) into something at least as immersive as BoB2.

[phoenix1963]

Get a grip guys!

If you look in the Parts folder you'll see Bob and Core.

So for an UNMERGED sequel you'll see Core and Moskva or somesuch.
For a merged install you'll see Core, Bob & Moskva.

So the Core parts of the game will be updated.

QED

56RAF_phoenix

[Richie]

Everyone is clear what sequels are right. Not new games but addons to the existing game to make it fuller. Like Forgotten Battles got. About five times it's original size.

Pretty much what I got out of this is " Nothing much new will come out of CLOD , you will need to buy the sequel to have more features"

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

Aye, but will support for the BoB aspect continue?

That depeonds on your definition of 'support'

If your definition of support is 'reasonable' and means you will get all the new features that BS mentioned, than the answer is yes. Assming 1C does what they have allways done (read track record) and include all the planes, maps, etc from thier previous version into their next version (read sqeual)

If your definition of support is 'unreasonable' and means you expect every plane, boat, train, car, wagon, ice cream stand that was aval in the real world during the summer of BoB.. Than the answer is most likly no

Originally Posted by philip.ed

As it stands, it's arguably the most inferior off-line representation of Battle of Britain on the market (in terms of air-combat-simulation).

Disagree 100%

Originally Posted by philip.ed

There is nothing that immerses you in the battle.

Disagree 100%

Well.. retract that.. maybe true for you, but surly not for all

Originally Posted by philip.ed

It's not a simulation; it's a technical representation.

What?

Originally Posted by philip.ed

I seriously hope this game manifests (offline) into something at least as immersive as BoB2.

See above

[Krt_Bong]

I still find it amusing to see people get indignant about how their game is unplayable, when their Sig describes a rig better than mine and make assumptions on what the developers are doing based on a few short sentences. I have no doubt that they are doing the best they can, and saying very little on purpose. The Peanut Gallery is a vicious mob.
my game is very playable...