![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And it's in this case that the FM matters, where the better plane wins. After all speed and service ceiling were the most important things for a fighter pilot (he wanted to fly faster and higher), and these are plane's feature. I'm sure you know that an experten will not jump in a furball without analyzing the situation, he will avoid dogfights because an ambush is by far the better tactic. He will gain tactical advantage before the attack. If the players are both experten there will be a long fight at distance to gain advantage (both energetic and positional) because both will not risk to been fired at. During the training session in my squad I can be an experten in the red team but if the cadet in the blue team is closely going to follow the orders of an expert pilot then he's untouchable... probably he will not kill me but surely I will not have his head... because he was flying in the better plane (better climber or faster)... Because of this the training sessions are become quite long and boring... you know the result since the start of the mission: the team with the better planes wins. We start the fight at 2km and after 10 minutes we find ourselves at 8km. So the plane's performance IMO are the keys in a fight between experten.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 11-28-2011 at 10:49 AM. |
|
|