Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-22-2011, 11:53 AM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewolf View Post
Given that Messerschmitt is hiding somewhere within EADS (that's also why you see so many EADS sponsored Messerschmitts) I consider this Vid kinda ironic. If I were the pilot of the EF I'd be hard pressed not to pull the trigger. Completly understand KG26_Alpha's attitude here
one of my best mates is an ITAF pilot an is completing his syllabus on the EF: he said (and I quote) "it's an outstanding machine, you go from 200kts to 450 in roughly 5 secs and can turn around a pole! The flaws are distinctively British though!".

There seems to be a somehow unorthodox approach in British aircraft design: another good friend of mine is a Canadian Air Force pilot and flew with the Hawk when e still was a cadet and I remember him saying "the first impression when you sit inside the Hawk is that someone puked the instruments all over the cockpit" lol
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-22-2011, 12:01 PM
Bewolf's Avatar
Bewolf Bewolf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
There seems to be a somehow unorthodox approach in British aircraft design: another good friend of mine is a Canadian Air Force pilot and flew with the Hawk when e still was a cadet and I remember him saying "the first impression when you sit inside the Hawk is that someone puked the instruments all over the cockpit" lol
hehe, some traditions die hard
__________________
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-22-2011, 12:40 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

No matter what role it dresses up in, EADS, SEADS, CASCOM, IRST or DASS its still a flop as a multi role ac compared to its contemporaries.

It was purely an exercise in how much tax payers money can be wasted on an obsolete ac design.

Too many fingers were allowed into this pie, it took too long to develop and went way over its budget, result out of date over priced ac.

Turning with a Spit proves what ?

It can turn with a Spit in a high Speed turn ...yippee

You wont see this ac in such combat manoeuvres.

Of course IMHO



Edit:
Woops just seen swiss's post same thoughts as mine.

Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 11-22-2011 at 12:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-22-2011, 01:08 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha View Post
No matter what role it dresses up in, EADS, SEADS, CASCOM, IRST or DASS its still a flop as a multi role ac compared to its contemporaries.
I'm sorry man, but you can appreciate that without any evidence of what you say, your sentence can hardly be taken seriously.
Quote:
It was purely an exercise in how much tax payers money can be wasted on an obsolete ac design.
same as above.
Quote:
Too many fingers were allowed into this pie, it took too long to develop and went way over its budget, result out of date over priced ac.
I agree about the fingers and the development time, but it's a jet with a HUGE longevity ahead of it. Let's not forget that we still fly our Tornadoes and there are jets that are more than 30 years old on the lines.
Quote:
Turning with a Spit proves what ?
It can turn with a Spit in a high Speed turn ...yippee
that you don't need thrust vectoring to show off at an airshow

Quote:
You wont see this ac in such combat manoeuvres.

Of course IMHO



Edit:
Woops just seen swiss's post same thoughts as mine.
yeah, one kinda wonders what you guys think would be better than an EF, an F-35 maybe? The most expensive piece of military equipment ever developed and not even finished yet? mmmmmh
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-22-2011, 07:15 PM
pupo162 pupo162 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,188
Default

well, to be fair the eurifighter typhon is probably th eonly jet fighter i find good looking.

regarding its effectivness, really dont know, really dont care.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2011, 07:23 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

F-15 is still the best modern fighter IMHO.

The Eurofighter is not that bad an aircraft its just too late for the show...
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-22-2011, 07:44 PM
MD_Titus MD_Titus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 493
Default

stern - good posts.
__________________
specs -
OS - Win7 64 bit
CPU - Intel Core2duo x6800 OC@3.2ghz
MOBO - MB-EVGA122CKNF68BR
RAM - ddr2 6gb @800mhz
GPU - nVidia geforce GTX 280 1gb
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-22-2011, 12:28 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

The EF would have been an awesome plane - if it was out in the 90s...
Let's sum it up:

- it's over 10 years late
- has no stealth capabilities
- way too expensive
- it's 2011, yet there's still no thrust vectoring

This plane is friggin joke. On the other hand, it's the perfect weapon to scare the crap out of some 3rd world countries...
Too bad the "Allied" didn't lose any over Libya.

Rumor has it it came out as the favorite of the swiss airforce, they evaluated the EF, Rafale and Grippen.
Should that prove to be true, for the time in my life I'll join the lefties and vote it down.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-22-2011, 01:04 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
The EF would have been an awesome plane - if it was out in the 90s...
Let's sum it up:

- it's over 10 years late
So? What do you want, a new multi-role jet every 5 years? It was designed with longevity in mind. The F-18 is 25 years old, yet you don't hear a lot of people complaining about it (and let's not even look at the F-15 or F-16..).

Quote:
- has no stealth capabilities
has less stealth capabilities than an F-22 maybe, but it has a good stealth level.
Quote:
- way too expensive
is it? Compared to what exactly? Last time I checked an F-22 price tag it didn't come cheaper than an EF.
Quote:
- it's 2011, yet there's still no thrust vectoring
Yeah, too bad that thrust vectoring doesn't really serve much of a purpose, other than doing fancy manouvres at an airshow..

Quote:
This plane is friggin joke. On the other hand, it's the perfect weapon to scare the crap out of some 3rd world countries...
Too bad the "Allied" didn't lose any over Libya.
your conclusion is somehow despicable. And for the record, the US lost several "stealth" jets, most notably an F-117 over Serbia..

Quote:
Rumor has it it came out as the favorite of the swiss airforce, they evaluated the EF, Rafale and Grippen.
Should that prove to be true, for the time in my life I'll join the lefties and vote it down.
for once Switzerland could be good and give back some of the money they robbed over the last 100 years, so let's hope they buy them yes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-23-2011, 01:47 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
So? What do you want, a new multi-role jet every 5 years? It was designed with longevity in mind. The F-18 is 25 years old, yet you don't hear a lot of people complaining about it (and let's not even look at the F-15 or F-16..).
We have F18. It's save to assume they are the best maintained F18 on the planet.
Yet, we still have only 50% availability.


Quote:
has less stealth capabilities than an F-22 maybe, but it has a good stealth level.
For the this price and 2011?


Quote:
is it? Compared to what exactly? Last time I checked an F-22 price tag it didn't come cheaper than an EF.
The F22 is not available for Export, the way it looks right now they end production next year.
Given the fact they don't sell it, there's no need to discuss it.


Quote:
Yeah, too bad that thrust vectoring doesn't really serve much of a purpose, other than doing fancy manouvres at an airshow..
But outturnig a spit is an achievement?
I guess future Typhoon upgrades include the ability to outrun Mig 21s.


Quote:
your conclusion is somehow despicable. And for the record, the US lost several "stealth" jets, most notably an F-117 over Serbia..
I only know of the F117 lost in combat.
Then again, it was shot down by an elite AAA unit.
It actually only proves the existence of the golden shot, nothing more, nothing less.


Quote:
for once Switzerland could be good and give back some of the money they robbed over the last 100 years, so let's hope they buy them yes.

Actually I hope we buy the Grippen.
You get 2 of them for each eurofighter, double availability.
They are cheap to operate and idiotproof
Not EU
Not USA

In case we have to wait a few years maybe we should evaluate the Pak-Fa too, although they could be a bit oversized for this tiny country.

BTT:
What money? Stole from whom? Since 1911?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.