|
|
#92
11-01-2011, 02:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. 
|
|
#94
11-01-2011, 03:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
did david mention flying on the ball on his original post??? YOU brought that up in your first reply, thats where it immediatly became over complicated.
thats where YOU wanted to argue, flying on the ball has nothing at all to do with a radiator effecting speed. then you argued that perhaps the radiator being open should only effect speed by around 5 kmh, you showed us all a nice little graph, that you clearly didnt understand, i dont read german, but i can see numbers, and the numbers prove YOU wrong. you go on about facts, yet your making silly assumptions that "most people cant tell the difference in 50 kmh"......... and this is you, cant read a graph, cant read an instrument gauge, yet you claim to work at the biggest test range south of the 48.........never heard anything so ludicris in all my time reading these forums. this isnt about believing tom or david, its about you typing utter BS again and again into people's threads. now.....go ahead and dissect this into little quotes and replies so you can swing this further off topic, maybe even start name calling. Last edited by SYN_Repent; 11-01-2011 at 03:08 PM.
|
|
#95
11-01-2011, 03:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
easy, I know you and your type! So, Ill put you down as a vote for david too
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
|
|
#96
11-01-2011, 03:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrong where??
point to me where im wrong?? dont put me down for a vote for david, i did some testing myself, and did see speed differences, but by that time you had come along and inserted hand typed Diarrhoea into the thread..........again Last edited by SYN_Repent; 11-01-2011 at 03:59 PM.
|
|
#98
11-01-2011, 04:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Gee.. so many to pick from, but.. Lets go with this one from my last post Quote:
Not sure how you missed that the first time? My guess is you purposely missed it. But assuming that you truly missed it may I make a suggestion? Try doing what I do and break up what people say into smaller chucks and reply to those individually, than you wont miss something like that and force yourself to eat crow! Just a thought!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
|
|
#99
11-01-2011, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
S!
This thread delivers...
|
|
#100
11-01-2011, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
your saying i was wrong, about you saying you cant admit your wrong......show me where else i was wrong......
its a laugh, you spout a hundred lines to show how much more clever you are than people, how stupid they are, and how right you are, then when your caught out, and PROVED wrong.......you write one little line. you really need to start and get right to the point (if there ever is one) in your posts, because the majority of your words are just worthless spam, you have added nothing to this thread except the graph you produced to prove david right (great move btw). @ david, now lets get back to the original post, i did some testing in an E3, at 3000m with around 1.3ata and 2200 rpm, i was making about 420 kmh with rads closed the speed went up to around 440kmh, that was rads fully closed for a short period of time. Last edited by SYN_Repent; 11-01-2011 at 04:29 PM.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
