Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2011, 11:06 PM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

Ya, Oleg also said that the FM's for the IL2 aircraft were correct-didn't make it true. It took the mod community to create FM's that were even close to achieving the tested performance of the modeled aircraft.

And I'm sure the same is true here. Sorry, but a 109E topping out at 440-450 kph at sea level is about 50kph to slow.
See here: performance at 1.3ata demonstrated to be 498kph at sea level and 572 at 4800 meters.
And this was done with an E-1 prototype which did not have the later style, more efficient air intake and thus the performance of production E series types would probably be higher.
http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...w_109V15a.html
Even better, here:
http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...chreibung.html
Quite a bit more than we get currently.
So complain all you want but the hard data backs that the 109E is substantially under modeled, as are just about all aircraft in game, with the obvious exception of the Spit IIa.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.

Last edited by CWMV; 10-10-2011 at 11:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2011, 11:18 PM
Valec Valec is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CWMV View Post
See here: performance at 1.3ata demonstrated to be 498kph at sea level and 572 at 4800 meters.
498 kph

Bf E3 0m=467 max speed 4440m=552

Last edited by Valec; 10-10-2011 at 11:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2011, 11:21 PM
ReconNZ ReconNZ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CWMV View Post
Ya, Oleg also said that the FM's for the IL2 aircraft were correct-didn't make it true. It took the mod community to create FM's that were even close to achieving the tested performance of the modeled aircraft.

And I'm sure the same is true here. Sorry, but a 109E topping out at 440-450 kph at sea level is about 50kph to slow.
See here: performance at 1.3ata demonstrated to be 498kph at sea level and 572 at 4800 meters.
And this was done with an E-1 prototype which did not have the later style, more efficient air intake and thus the performance of production E series types would probably be higher.
http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...w_109V15a.html
Even better, here:
http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...chreibung.html
Quite a bit more than we get currently.
So complain all you want but the hard data backs that the 109E is substantially under modeled, as are just about all aircraft in game, with the obvious exception of the Spit IIa.

Woahhh hang on a minute CWMV.. Since when do hard facts and historical data have any place in this arguement?? That's no fair!

Seems I might have to rethink my postion on the whole 109's are modelled correctly stance...



I still think 109's are way better than Hurries and all Blue drivers who run away are little girls.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2011, 11:30 PM
Valec Valec is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 26
Default

ReconNZ N.1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2011, 11:38 PM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReconNZ View Post
Woahhh hang on a minute CWMV.. Since when do hard facts and historical data have any place in this arguement?? That's no fair!

Seems I might have to rethink my postion on the whole 109's are modelled correctly stance...



I still think 109's are way better than Hurries and all Blue drivers who run away are little girls.
So you're after little girls?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2011, 01:42 AM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CWMV View Post
And I'm sure the same is true here. Sorry, but a 109E topping out at 440-450 kph at sea level is about 50kph to slow.
L.Dv.556/3 for the E-1, -3

Max speed @

0km - 460kph
1km - 480kph
2km - 500kph
3km - 520kph
4km - 540kph
5km - 555kph
6km - 555kph
7km - 550kph

Now what were you saying about 50kph to slow?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-11-2011, 02:33 AM
Hellbender Hellbender is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 142
Default

Wow, when I see these numbers and compare it to the ingame perfomance of all the planes, I ask myself why the developers haven´t implemented that kind of data to the planes of the game ?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:24 AM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Schlageter View Post
L.Dv.556/3 for the E-1, -3

Max speed @

0km - 460kph
1km - 480kph
2km - 500kph
3km - 520kph
4km - 540kph
5km - 555kph
6km - 555kph
7km - 550kph

Now what were you saying about 50kph to slow?
That its 50kph too slow.
Ive already posted it, but here goes again...
http://www.kurfurst.org/Performance_...chreibung.html
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:37 AM
Valec Valec is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CWMV View Post
That its 50kph too slow.
Ive already posted it, but here goes again...
http://www.kurfurst.org/Performance_...chreibung.html
LOOK

http://www.airpages.ru/eng/lw/bf109e1.shtml http://www.aviation-history.com/mess...itt/bf109.html

Last edited by Valec; 10-11-2011 at 06:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:38 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

CWM Yes but see if you can find another source for E models getting 500Kmh at sea level, that is imo an exceptional event. Just about every ref I have seen is in the 460Kmh or so sea level area.

Even here the Swiss tests show 460-470 at sea level:

http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...109E_J347.html

And the French tests only get 500Kmh (clapped out E I can here some saying at around 3000m, though the other numbers compare quiet well with the L.Dv.556/3 for the E-1, -3 stuff quoted in this thread.





This all becomes a circular tail chase depending on the references you choose and or trust. The majority are in the L.Dv.556/3 type performance area.

Last edited by IvanK; 10-11-2011 at 06:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.