Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II
I dunno man, it's a combination of facts that makes me think it was a draw:
1) Germany didn't achieve its results as planned, but it didn't give up, it turned its attention to another front.
2) Britain did sustain a lot of damage by the bombing raids, which continued well into 1941.
3) There was no change in terms of territorial dominance (heck, channel islands weren't even freed until the end of the war!), just a war of attrition, with Britain sustaining more of the damage.
|
1. It didn't give up, it just stopped trying... uhuh gotcha....
2. Yes but unless one of those raids had a nuke onboard it wasn't going to change diddly....
3. Yes you are correct there was no change of territorial dominance. Trouble for your argument is that one of the stated aims of one side was to affect a change of territorial dominance and the stated aim of the other was to prevent this!
And yet you think it was a draw.....
Regards Mike