Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2011, 12:28 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albx View Post
First of all, why should I turn down my settings if till the official patch (1.02) it run not very bad? Second, with or without the effects the slideshow is still there. Third, the problems are random, now you can have good performances with alot of planes, no stutters and no freezes, a minute later alot of stutters and freezes also if you are alone in the sky, for me this mean the game is still not optimized. Buy another PC? my specs are not so bad, and why the culprit should be the user and not the game? So, you are telling the game runs bad on our system because we are not able to make it run good? great idea...

What am i suppose to say? A game runs fine for 50% and bad for 50% (random numbers), what conclusion can one make from that? As far as im consened there is only one to be made. Its not like they are selling 2 different versions of the game.

Sry.


Why am i having freezes and lag on 10 year old games and the next guy dont? Games fault? You can stubbornly hold on to "not going to dial down settings because it worked fine on the least version", but does it help you in any way, does it solve the problem?


Anyways, i don't think this discussion is meant for this thread.



Edit: Dont know if u are talking on or offline or both but there is a huge difference.

Last edited by Baron; 09-17-2011 at 12:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2011, 12:42 PM
pupo162 pupo162 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
What am i suppose to say? A game runs fine for 50% and bad for 50%, what conclusion can one make from that? As far as im consened there is only one to be made.

Sry.


Why am i having freezes and lag on 10 year old games and the next guy dont? Games fault?


Anyways, i don't think this discussion is meant for this thread.



Edit: Dont know if u are talking on or offline or both but there is a huge difference.
PC Configuration

* OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows® 7 / Vista SP2 / Windows XP SP3
* PROCESSOR: Pentium® Dual-Core 2.0GHz or Athlon™ X2 3800+ (Intel Core i5 2.66GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 2.6GHz recommended)
* RAM: 2GB (4GB recommended)
* VIDEO CARDirectX® 9.0c compliant, 512Mb Video Card (1GB DirectX® 10 recommended) – See supported List*
* DIRECT X®: DirectX® 9.0c (included on disc)
* DVD-ROM DRIVE: 8X
* SOUND CARD: DirectX 9.0c compatible (… recommended)
* HARD DISK: 10GB
* PERIPHERALS: Mouse, keyboard
* MULTIPLAY: Broadband connection with 128 kbps upstream or faster
* An internet connexion is required to activate the game

im in between minimun and recomended. and the gmae will lag and freeze with low settings.

I have no issues with the game requiring a minimun fo an i9 32gb ram and 5 gtx960 on uber SLI, but that should be said on the box. i baught this game becosue i had the settings to run it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2011, 12:47 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
PC Configuration

* OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows® 7 / Vista SP2 / Windows XP SP3
* PROCESSOR: Pentium® Dual-Core 2.0GHz or Athlon™ X2 3800+ (Intel Core i5 2.66GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 2.6GHz recommended)
* RAM: 2GB (4GB recommended)
* VIDEO CARDirectX® 9.0c compliant, 512Mb Video Card (1GB DirectX® 10 recommended) – See supported List*
* DIRECT X®: DirectX® 9.0c (included on disc)
* DVD-ROM DRIVE: 8X
* SOUND CARD: DirectX 9.0c compatible (… recommended)
* HARD DISK: 10GB
* PERIPHERALS: Mouse, keyboard
* MULTIPLAY: Broadband connection with 128 kbps upstream or faster
* An internet connexion is required to activate the game

im in between minimun and recomended. and the gmae will lag and freeze with low settings.

I have no issues with the game requiring a minimun fo an i9 32gb ram and 5 gtx960 on uber SLI, but that should be said on the box. i baught this game becosue i had the settings to run it.
I completely agree with u here and i cant for the life of me understand why those recommendations still stands.

Everyone knows its not even close. At least not minimum requirements.

I would say that their recommended specs is , at best, minimum requirement.






I blame UBI.

Last edited by Baron; 09-17-2011 at 12:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2011, 12:51 PM
pupo162 pupo162 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
I completely agree with u here and i cant for the life of me understand why those recommendations still stands.

Everyone knows its not even close.
becouse it is imposible to switch recommended settings nad minimu nafter going gold.

You just cant sell a product that says "will work with this PC" and 6 months after go "Ooops, we were wrong, it wont work after all".

the only way for MG to clean its name is performance increase, fullfill their indications.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2011, 12:49 PM
albx albx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
What am i suppose to say? A game runs fine for 50% and bad for 50% (random numbers), what conclusion can one make from that? As far as im consened there is only one to be made. Its not like they are selling 2 different versions of the game.

Sry.


Why am i having freezes and lag on 10 year old games and the next guy dont? Games fault? You can stubbornly hold on to "not going to dial down settings because it worked fine on the least version", but does it help you in any way, does it solve the problem?


Anyways, i don't think this discussion is meant for this thread.



Edit: Dont know if u are talking on or offline or both but there is a huge difference.
Dialing down the settings don't solve the problems.
Where you got those statistics? anyway, I tested it online and offline, and IMO who say it runs fine haven't properly tested the beta patch, that's all...
You can go on the sukhoi.ru forum, use google translator if you need it, and you'll see how many of the users reports bad performance with this beta. Look again at your statistics Baron...
__________________
AMD Phenom II X4 965BE OC@3.8ghz
DDR3 G.Skill eco 4gb
ATI Asus EAH6950 2GB shaders unlocked
Asus Xonar DX
Asrock 870 extreme3
Windows7 x64 Ultimate
Saitek X52pro (stick modded) - Saitek rudder pedals - SteelSeries Siberia V2 headset
Freetrack ps3eye
Samsung 23" SyncMaster XL2370

Last edited by albx; 09-17-2011 at 12:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.