Baking aircraft variants.

[furbs]

Originally Posted by Avimimus

Er... no. Technically no.

However, I hold the possibility that they might have shot out water logged banks along "high roads" and caused a give-way under the weight of the tank (allowing it to roll into the ditch).

HES JOKING!!!(again) sense of humor fail!

[Ctrl E]

Originally Posted by Mr_Steven

Mustang pilots used to bounce .50's off the ground into the bellies of German tanks and flip them right over, so hopefully some Mustangs.







...

actually not that far out.

Australian pilots flying mustangs in ground support roles during the early period of combat in korea managed to destroy north korean t-34s by bouncing their .50 rounds off the ground into the soft underside of the tank.
was rare but happened.

[Strike]

Heinkel Lerche

[Bewolf]

Well, who knows, maybe we will see this one day:



Tommy could really do well with a Destroyer like plane and all those bombers.

[robtek]

Originally Posted by Ctrl E

actually not that far out.

Australian pilots flying mustangs in ground support roles during the early period of combat in korea managed to destroy north korean t-34s by bouncing their .50 rounds off the ground into the soft underside of the tank.
was rare but happened.

URBAN LEGEND!!!!!

The .50 cal AP, as used then in aircraft, can penetrate up to 20mm armor at about 100 yard and at a angle of 90°.
After passing aircraft-type aluminium sheeting only 10 mm.
The bottom armor of the T-34/85 is 20 mm.
No way in hell that a ricochet penetrates that.

[robtek]

Originally Posted by Bewolf

Well, who knows, maybe we will see this one day:



Tommy could really do well with a Destroyer like plane and all those bombers.

But that would be in a alternate history, so we could also get this:

[yellonet]

Originally Posted by robtek

URBAN LEGEND!!!!!

The .50 cal AP, as used then in aircraft, can penetrate up to 20mm armor at about 100 yard and at a angle of 90°.
After passing aircraft-type aluminium sheeting only 10 mm.
The bottom armor of the T-34/85 is 20 mm.
No way in hell that a ricochet penetrates that.

Let's not start this again, I tend to think of it like this, it could have happened once or twice that a tank got disabled by .50 cal fire by some random fluke, bullets hitting an external fuel tank, burning fuel entering the exhaust and destroying the engine or whatever, anyway, it's not outside the realm of possibility.
BUT, it is so unlikely that in the sim it should be impossible.

Now back on topic?

What's cooking is probably some new variants of aircraft that we already have, that would seem the most logical.
But I'm hoping for the Beau and the Do 17

[Bewolf]

Originally Posted by robtek

But that would be in a alternate history, so we could also get this:

Eh, the Whirlwind was in active service from June 40, ample records of that till 1943 AFAIK, the Falke was only rumored to be active in Scandinavia, and only got into service in winter 40/41. Would be a great match-up for sure, however.

[Kodoss]

It would be also nice to have the Blackburn Skua and Roc.
Since the Skua was The first plane who downed a Do 18 for the Fleet Air Arm.
Also it was active in Norway 1940 and in the Battle of Dunkirk.
They still fought until 1941 in the Mediterranean.

[smink1701]

Originally Posted by timej31

Luthier said "We have quite a few new aircraft variants in the oven".

Does anyone know what is in the works? Is there anything exciting coming with these tasty new weapons?? Anything that punches really big holes into targets??

I hope Luthier is talking about new models vs very subtle varients of existing models. I don't get much our of additional versions where you can't really tell one from the other. I think this is true with the Bf. 109 E-1, which was included in the last patch. Can't tell a diff from the other models. Am I missing something???