Very short development update - Page 35

David Hayward · #**341** 07-26-2011, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs

David, you understand that people want different things?
and that people think differently to you?

I'm not sure why that matters? We have seen regular updates and they all end up with people complaining.

furbs · #**342** 07-26-2011, 02:08 PM

I know, its just i dont get why you object so much, how does it affect you?

So do you have TS 2? lets talk.

Oh im in =BKHZ= online sqd

JG52Krupi · #**343** 07-26-2011, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs

Over the last few days ive been flying and chatting online with Krupi, we used to disagree about a few things on here but after chatting we get along just fine.

Yes it has been useful, talking on ts get around the personal insults that we get on a forum... While we disagree on somethings at the end of the day we are still positive on the future of the game its just a matter of time before it's sorted.

But we have come to agree that we should be kept in the loop regardless of what effect we can have on the patches.

furbs · #**344** 07-26-2011, 02:14 PM

Yep, come on David, im extending my hand in friendship

Lets talk.

David Hayward · #**345** 07-26-2011, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs

I know, its just i dont get why you object so much, how does it affect you?

The only thing I object to is all the whining in here. It affects me because it makes this board unreadable. No amount of talking is going to change that.

furbs · #**346** 07-26-2011, 02:22 PM

Unreadable? come on now, is that the only reason?

robtek · #**347** 07-26-2011, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

.......But we have come to agree that we should be kept in the loop regardless of what effect we can have on the patches.

That is the point!!!

We all think that we "should be kept in the loop", the problem is this little word : should !!!

But when i look at most of the demanding posts they are read like :

"We must have information"

"We have a right for information"

"We demand information"

Thats very different from "We should have information"

I also would like to be informed more regularily, but i wouldn't think of demanding that.

Lets agree to "we should have more and regular information."

And of course "Peace for the world"

JG52Krupi · #**348** 07-26-2011, 02:23 PM

@david

I entirely agree but we should be getting some sort of info, communication is at the heart of all relationships and it the same for this forum.

David Hayward · #**349** 07-26-2011, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs

Unreadable? come on now, is that the only reason?

Yes, unreadable. I can't even think of any other reasons why I would care.

furbs · #**350** 07-26-2011, 02:28 PM

So if we had a sub forum for this sort of post, you would be happy? and leave us moaners alone?