Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2011, 07:38 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i duno but please remove all emotion from thought a second.

were not really that childish, were not trolls. were all practically mature humans in there 30's, With all due respect wether its a translational issue or other theres somthing not right here and i dont believe it is us.

im in belief Luthier had stated we will try get back to weekly updates. throughout the life of development there has always been weekly updates, But now it appears that we have bought the game and are not entitled to them or to even expect them, Luthier told us we would didnt he ? That is in essence where the malcontent has come from.

We are practically the number one advocators to this product. Cant 1C identify with that ?. Yes we have caused all sorts of trouble, but we still are customers of 1C who have bought a product that wasnt entirely ready for the market for various reasons. We feel decieved because of how it was released and when it was released, Now today the least we are expecting is communication on the matter. the very least. We are not getting it. and Nearmiss wether you agree or disagree is insignificant because we are demanding some decent communication about whats going on. its not a threat its an observation. If 1C would like to appease this situation commnunicate with us. That what will appease your customers base wether you agree or not.
  #2  
Old 07-20-2011, 07:41 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Fish View Post
We are practically the number one advocators to this product. Cant 1C identify with that ?. Yes we have caused all sorts of trouble, but we still are customers of 1C who have bought a product that wasnt entirely ready for the market for various reasons. We feel decieved because of how it was released and when it was released, Now today the least we are expecting is communication on the matter. the very least. We are not getting it. and Nearmiss wether you agree or disagree is insignificant because we are demanding some decent communication about whats going on. its not a threat its an observation. If 1C would like to appease this situation commnunicate with us. That what will appease your customers base wether you agree or not.
You`re wrong about one main thing, Ali Fish.
You consider yourselves a side of this discussion. You got rid of this status at your own wish.
  #3  
Old 07-20-2011, 07:48 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
You`re wrong about one main thing, Ali Fish.
You consider yourselves a side of this discussion. You got rid of this status at your own wish.
Status ? you mean your made up status of what you think is anothers status.

Ive tried to apologise ,but now you wont let it go. your as bad as everyone else. except we dont mirror and match alternatives just to suit your own idea of your own status around here.

PM if you feel i get out of hand nearmiss. LOLOLOL. laughable very laughable.
  #4  
Old 07-20-2011, 07:55 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Fish View Post
Status ? you mean your made up status of what you think is anothers status.
Actually, we all lost the status of a side Luthier can talk to, just like Ataros said it went with the Sukhoi.ru forums. Do you understand? They won`t talk to you, me or anyone else now.


Quote:
Ive tried to apologise ,but now you wont let it go. your as bad as everyone else. except we dont mirror and match alternatives just to suit your own idea of your own status around here.
You also thought that your posting history entitles you somehow to post the same drivel as the long time moaners here.
And no, I never thought that I was better than anyone. It`s my attitude that`s better. It`s more productive. I do know that my message is rough compared to Redroach`s or Bliss`s but I also do my part getting it across.

Because where`s action, it`ll be met with reaction.
  #5  
Old 07-20-2011, 08:10 PM
Anvilfolk Anvilfolk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 141
Default

Oh, just stop it, everyone.

Let's leave it at this, and before you post - whatever "side" you are on - make sure whether ANYONE, ESPECIALLY the dev team, is going to find the content of the post useful. This does NOT include posts about known issues, unless they help shed some extra light or are backed up by evidence. It also does not include posts bashing other members' opinions. If you disagree, provide either contrary evidence, or evidence that undermines the premises of the original argument. That's the way argumentation goes.

On a personal level, I agree with these new measures, as I find this forum less and less useful for anything. I do not agree with taking out the petition, although I wouldn't subscribe. I'd suggest the petition should be a poll, with option of agreeing or being indifferent.

Constructive feedback, criticism and debates. We all need to take a step back.
  #6  
Old 07-20-2011, 07:41 PM
JG1_Wanderfalke JG1_Wanderfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: EDDM
Posts: 90
Default

this is very suspicious.

The end is near.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.