![]() |
|
Technical threads All discussions about technical issues |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My base score is 5.9. That means no matter how good the other hardware score is, my PC will only run programs with a 5.9 or lower rating.
I'm able to run CLoD at good FPS with this Base score. So if anyone that test there PC with this and have a 5.9 or above base score and say thy are having trouble running CLoD IT"S NOT YOUR HARDWARE. What is the Windows Experience Index? The Windows Experience Index measures the capability of your computer's hardware and software configuration and expresses this measurement as a number called a base score. A higher base score generally means that your computer will perform better and faster than a computer with a lower base score, especially when performing more advanced and resource-intensive tasks. Each hardware component receives an individual subscore. Your computer's base score is determined by the lowest subscore. For example, if the lowest subscore of an individual hardware component is 2.6, then the base score is 2.6. The base score is not an average of the combined subscores. However, the subscores can give you a view of how the components that are most important to you will perform, and can help you decide which components to upgrade. You can use the base score to buy programs and other software that are matched to your computer's base score. For example, if your computer has a base score of 3.3, then you can buy any software designed for this version of Windows that requires a computer with a base score of 3 or lower. The scores currently range from 1.0 to 7.9. The Windows Experience Index is designed to accommodate advances in computer technology. As hardware speed and performance improve, higher score ranges will be enabled. The standards for each level of the index generally stay the same. However, in some cases, new tests might be developed that can result in lower scores. Note If your computer has a 64-bit central processing unit (CPU) and 4 gigabytes (GB) or less random access memory (RAM), then the Memory (RAM) subscore for your computer will have a maximum of 5.9. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() S!
__________________
Gigabyte Z68 Intel 2500K (@4.3 ghz)212 CM Cooler 8GB Ram EVGA 660SC (super clocked) 2GB Vram CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W 64 GB SSD SATA II HD WIN7 UL 64BIT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, but I still say it is bullpoop. You cannot make a definitive statement on what will or will not run based on crude figures like this. There are generally game-specific recommendations (as for CloD), and they will be much more relevant.
(to answer your question, I have a 128 GB CRUCIAL SSD, and a I TB Western Digital Caviar Green Sata 2 HDD -of course, performance may depend on what is installed where)
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2. OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung. Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(to answer your question, I have a 128 GB CRUCIAL SSD, and a I TB Western Digital Caviar Green Sata 2 HDD -of course, performance may depend on what is installed where)[/QUOTE]
Good to see you score high with the 128 GB CRUCIAL SSD. I'm putting in a Crucial M4 CT064M4SSD2 2.5" 64GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive when it gets here Monday or the next day. The only thing I'm putting on this SSD is W-7, CLoD and RoF. This should make W-7 much faster because W-7 was set-up to run on SDD's as is CLoD and RoF. I say CloD is set-up to run on SDD's because W-7 is. And for CLoD to run it's best is on W-7 64 bit. Last edited by AARPRazorbacks; 06-27-2011 at 04:14 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I was first considering getting a solid state drive, I did some googling and came across an article that explained in great detail how the Windows experience index is perfectly useless for evaluating SSDs, since the index uses the drive's rotation speed as an important criteria. And of course a SSD doesn't have a rotation speed. So with that bit of information missing, all the other numbers are garbage.
I don't have the link anymore, and don't recall where I found it. ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() on the other hand we should not have to buy expensive equipment to compensate for bad code.... S!
__________________
Gigabyte Z68 Intel 2500K (@4.3 ghz)212 CM Cooler 8GB Ram EVGA 660SC (super clocked) 2GB Vram CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W 64 GB SSD SATA II HD WIN7 UL 64BIT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Windows 7 is made to run SSD. Windows experience index was up dated to test SSD drives in W-7. Say goodbye to those times when the maximum score that a Windows Vista PC could return was 5.9. With the introduction of Windows 7, the Windows Experience Index has evolved from 5.9 up to no less than 7.9. However, at the same time, other aspects of the WEI have not changed in the least. The score that Windows 7 will return will continue to be based on the lowest subscore, taking into consideration hardware resources such as Processor; Memory (RAM); Graphics; Gaming Graphics (typically 3D); and Primary Hard Disk. But while the scoring is the same as the one debuted in Vista, the WEI can now go as high as 7.9. “In Vista, the WEI scores ranged from 1.0 to 5.9. In Windows 7, the range has been extended upward to 7.9. The scoring rules for devices have also changed from Vista to reflect experience and feedback comparing closely rated devices with differing quality of actual use (i.e. to make the rating more indicative of actual use.) We know during the beta some folks have noticed that the score changed (relative to Vista) for one or more components in their system and this tuning, which we will describe here, is responsible for the change,” Michael Fortin, one of Microsoft’s distinguished engineers and head of the Windows Fundamentals feature team, revealed. With Windows 7, the maximum score possible will be 7.9, a good couple of points up from Vista's 5.9. What will take for a computer to achieve the new WEI peak? Well, according to Microsoft, nothing short of the key technology improvements as they go mainstream, namely solid state disks, but also high-end graphics and multi-core processors, plus a consistent volume of RAM. “For these new levels, we’re working to add guidelines for each level. As an example for gaming users, we expect systems with gaming graphics scores in the 6.0 to 6.9 range to support DX10 graphics and deliver good frames rates at typical screen resolutions (like 40-50 frames per second at 1280x1024). In the range of 7.0 to 7.9, we would expect higher frame rates at even higher screen resolutions. Obviously, the specifics of each game have much to do with this and the WEI scores are also meant to help game developers decide how best to scale their experience on a given system,” Fortin added, indicating that graphics remained an area with the largest amount of scores available. The bottom line is that, in order to achieve a perfect 7.9 Windows 7 score, users will have to buy a computer powered by at least an 8 core processor. However, the processor is simply not enough. Customers will also have to feed their machine with RAM, somewhere in the vicinity of 8 GB. At the same time, Solid State Drives (SSDs) with very high random I/O rates and as low as possible latency issues will also contribute to getting close to 7.9. When it comes to graphics, users will need a card with at least DirectX 10 support and a WDDM 1.1 driver. {And of course a SSD doesn't have a rotation speed. So with that bit of information missing, all the other numbers are garbage.} There are SSD developers that use Windows experience index from W-7 to test an sell there SSD's like this. And all PC game developers know of this. Like IC. Single SandForce Driven™ SSDs Are First to Proclaim Maximum Windows Experience Index Storage Score SandForce Driven SSD Manufacturers Proudly Demonstrate Production SATA 6Gb/s SSDs at Computex including the latest program member, Kingston Technology COMPUTEX TAIPEI 2011 June 02, 2011 02:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time TAIPEI, Taiwan--(EON: Enhanced Online News)--SandForce® Inc., the innovator of Solid State Drive (SSD) Processors that drive ubiquitous deployment of volume flash memory into primary and I/O intensive data storage applications, today announced that single SSDs based on the SF-2000 SSD Processor and advanced 25nm multi-level cell (MLC) flash memory achieve the highest possible Microsoft Windows Experience Index (WEI) score of 7.9 for the disk data transfer rate. Microsoft provides the WEI to enable end users to easily identify their system’s capabilities when considering running high-performance applications with the best user experience. Today a single SF-2000-based SandForce Driven™ SSD eliminates storage access bottlenecks and future-proofs the system for optimally running current and next generation, data throughput-intensive applications. “Our mission critical Mobile Workstations and Mobile Servers will be vastly improved with the addition of SF-2000 series SSDs, with up to 4 drives in RAID 0/1/5/10 configurations” The SF-2000 processors feature a 6 Gigabit-per-second (Gb/s) SATA host interface, an unprecedented sustained sequential read/write performance of up to 500 Megabytes per second (MB/s), award-winning DuraClass™ Technology, and state-of-the-art, high-speed ONFi2 and Toggle flash interfaces supporting single-level cell (SLC) & MLC NAND flash families from all major suppliers. “SandForce SSD Processors optimize the entire Microsoft Windows computing experience with incredible boot and program loading times while enhancing systems responsiveness under virtually all workloads when compared to traditional spinning media as well as other SSD solutions,” said Sumit Puri, Sr. Director of Strategic Marketing for SandForce. “Our innovative DuraClass technology is uniquely positioned to optimize data transfers between increasingly faster, multi-core processors and the SSD storage media, providing the highest system-level performance and longest endurance with standard NAND flash memory.” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AARPRazorbacks, a simple question. Are you in any way connected with Microsoft? Your repeated postings about the 'Microsoft Windows Experience Index', and your reluctance to reply to negative comments, suggest to me that you either lack objectivity, or aren't interested in anyone's opinion but your own. Can you explain why we should take your opinions seriously?
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2. OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung. Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous. ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don't know why you'd get a low score for your Disk drive. Even though it's a small partition it's over 25% free. (obviously you using that partition for the OS and not much else.) I wonder how they work out that score? Cheers! |
![]() |
|
|