Friday (27.05.11) is approaching!

[Trooper117]

I don't believe it.. someone actualy took the bait!..

Originally Posted by Trooper117

I don't believe it.. someone actualy took the bait!..

Don't tell him mate. I've got a Harbour Bridge to sell him. It's in Sydney and it's as cheap as chips.

[Vengeanze]

Originally Posted by 602Sqn.McLean

Don't tell him mate. I've got a Harbour Bridge to sell him. It's in Sydney and it's as cheap as chips.

Hilarious! Thanks!

all i can say is FULL SCREEN PLEASE, in the nicest possible way of course

Tired of the flashing before and after loading of my desktop, and the windows "dings" whenever i make a key press, AA would be nice too.

[Kankkis]

No even words today from Devs

[Lololopoulos]

i would like to hear something from even a moderator.

[Redroach]

Originally Posted by BigPickle

all i can say is FULL SCREEN PLEASE, in the nicest possible way of course

Tired of the flashing before and after loading of my desktop, and the windows "dings" whenever i make a key press, AA would be nice too.

what? this is still what annoys you most right now?

Nevermind, I'm still going for unresponsive wingmen/squads/radar/towers(!) and the ability to fly generic planes/loadouts only. Plus various FM issues like the 109's PP and inconvenient ways to use the RAF compasses and so on and so on..

[Ze-Jamz]

Originally Posted by Redroach

what? this is still what annoys you most right now?

Nevermind, I'm still going for unresponsive wingmen/squads/radar/towers(!) and the ability to fly generic planes/loadouts only. Plus various FM issues like the 109's PP and inconvenient ways to use the RAF compasses and so on and so on..

what? this is still what annoys you most right now?

Nevermind, I'm still going for unresponsive wingmen/squads/radar/towers(!) and the ability to fly generic planes/loadouts only. Plus various FM issues like the 109's PP,Spit 1/1a's incorrect performance and inconvenient ways to use the RAF compasses and so on and so on..

There..thats better

~S~

[Vengeanze]

I feel abused. 1C exploit our dedication to this genre.
I'm this close to feck this. I wish that the americans or swedes would take an interest in combat flightsim as obviosuly the russians suck at programming and customer care.

[ARM505]

Originally Posted by Vengeanze

I feel abused. 1C exploit our dedication to this genre.
I'm this close to feck this. I wish that the americans or swedes would take an interest in combat flightsim as obviosuly the russians suck at programming and customer care.

Neither Americans nor Swedes will produce another quality combat flight sim, for the same reason that 1C is now struggling - money. Americans used to produce the best sims, until the financial realities of having the necessary large, highly competent team caught up. 1C was able to reap the benefits of the skilled Russian workforce for longer due to the financial situation there, but it has caught up with them too now. Fact: A large, intelligent, qualified body of developers will make more money more efficiently (ie enough to actually survive as a company for a start) doing something else, NOT flightsims. I doubt we will see another WW2 flight sim in the forseeable future (with the possible exception of a 777-developed one, itself highly debatable). It's just too niche - the production time and effort required for the level of fidelity needed yields almost no rewards.

Flight sim limitations have long since moved from the technical, to the financial IMHO.