Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 05-23-2011, 01:00 PM
David198502's Avatar
David198502 David198502 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eldur View Post
Someone showed me this:

http://www.cockpitinstrumente.de/Flu...ung/Bilder.htm

It says:



The essential part, marked as bold font translated: The RPM is increased by pressing the Lever upwards and it's decreased by pressing it downwards. The Lever returns to the neutral position by itself.

That basically means it should be controlled just like the trim or the water radiators. So the way we have it now is not correct.
+1 for realism!i only fly the bf now and if it worked the way we have it now in game,then please keep it.btw, now i think you can control it much more accurate than before.
and i dont see the problem...why is it not correct the way we have the pp now?
"The essential part, marked as bold font translated: The RPM is increased by pressing the Lever upwards and it's decreased by pressing it downwards. The Lever returns to the neutral position by itself."
i think its exactly the way it works now.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 05-23-2011, 02:52 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VO101_Tom View Post
Hi.

This very interesting topic, who wrote the original post (schwarze-man), it is possible to contact him somewhere? I did not find it in my documents from the velocity of the propeller pitch accurate information.

But, if this true:
"The prop will adjust its pitch at a speed of 1.5° (degrees) per second for as long as the rocker switch is held and then stop when the switch is released. The movement of the pitch indicator is clockwise=fine,anti-clockwise=coarse. 1 Hour=6°,10min=1° so,1.5°/sec is 15min/sec or 1hour in 4sec! The range of the propellor is from 12.30 (full fine) to 08.30 (full coarse) and this equates to a pitch range of 22° to 46° "

...It is necessary to fix this in the game then! In COD (1.01.14588 patch), PP moving from 08:30 to 12:00 (21°) takes 58 sec! This means it, that PP moving speed 0.36°/sec. Compared with the value written early (1.5°/sec, or even in other documents 1°/sec), this huge difference, huge disadvantage (totally irrelevant, that PP are automatic or manual)! Some authentic source would be very good from this.
Schwarze-man has been responsible for a number of DB605 engine restorations he is about as "experten" on DB engines as you are going to get !
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 05-23-2011, 02:59 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
in this book
http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/imag...299956&s=books

a speed of 3° per second is giving for a VDM propeller.
So, as one hour on the gauge is showing a difference of 6° of propellerpitch change , with the actuel speed of ~16sec for one hour , CoD is to slow indeed.

CoD = 6° in 16sec
real (according to linked book)= 6° in 2 sec

Which VDM propeller and in which aircraft ? Fw190 kommandgerate operation has a different pitch slew rate to the DB system that lacks kommandgerate.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 05-23-2011, 04:59 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Schwarze-man has been responsible for a number of DB605 engine restorations he is about as "experten" on DB engines as you are going to get !
I did not know him, but im spoken with Kürfürst an afternoon, he said who he is. He tries to establish the contact with him (there were a couple of exchanges of e-mails with years before). But - according to these - he totally reliable source, there is not a claim onto an other document. Right?
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 05-23-2011, 06:15 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Which VDM propeller and in which aircraft ? Fw190 kommandgerate operation has a different pitch slew rate to the DB system that lacks kommandgerate.
i dont know. And wondering why the electric system of a VDM should work in different speeds with a BMW or DB601.

Anyway, if you choose 1° , 3° or something between per second, all is better than this 0,3...°
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 05-24-2011, 12:43 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VO101_Tom View Post
I did not know him, but im spoken with Kürfürst an afternoon, he said who he is. He tries to establish the contact with him (there were a couple of exchanges of e-mails with years before). But - according to these - he totally reliable source, there is not a claim onto an other document. Right?
I communicate regularly with Schwarze man. As I indicated before he is a true DB605 expert. What he says is Gospel.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 05-24-2011, 12:45 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
i dont know. And wondering why the electric system of a VDM should work in different speeds with a BMW or DB601.

Anyway, if you choose 1° , 3° or something between per second, all is better than this 0,3...°
Because the FW190 system was a far more spophisticated system than that used in the BF109. There was no Kommandgerate system on the 109. I am away from some BMW801 refrences at the moment. In those refrences are some BMW801 Prop pitch slew rates. Once I find them I will post.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 05-24-2011, 08:49 AM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Because the FW190 system was a far more spophisticated system than that used in the BF109. There was no Kommandgerate system on the 109. I am away from some BMW801 refrences at the moment. In those refrences are some BMW801 Prop pitch slew rates. Once I find them I will post.
The speed of propeller angle change is a function of the speed/torque of the electric motor that drives it, not wheter the constant speed govenor system wassophisticated or not..

Currently, from what I've seen in the forums I see the the following problems with Bf 109E propeller pitch control:

1, As per Luthier's newest patch log, the 109E-3 changed propeller cannot be feathered.. silly. The December 1939 109E pilot manual instructs the pilot to use "Segelstellung", ie. "Sailing Position" = feathered propeller position. The 109E could be fully feathered!!

2, The instument board pp. change lever has labels and positions for groBer and kleiner Drehzahl (increase/decrease rpm) settings but the real one had an extra bottom position: Segelstellung. This was fixed, ie. the lever stayed there and keep the propeller in feathered position when set, explicetely for the purpose of freeing him from the burden of having the keep pressing the lever all the time1!

3, Appearantly something also went wrong with the propellor pitch change speed and it is now 0.3 deg/sec.. bah. The documented figure is about 1 deg/sec.


In short what needs to be fixed:

1, (re-)Adding a fully featherable propellor and key binding for it on the 109E series, plus graphical rework of the dashboard prop pitch lever.
2, Fixing the propellor pitch speed change which became abnormally low.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 05-24-2011, 12:25 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
...

1, (re-)Adding a fully featherable propellor and key binding for it on the 109E series, plus graphical rework of the dashboard prop pitch lever.
....
Hali. Már én is beraktam ide korábban erről infót, hogy három helyett négy állású lenne a légcsavar állásszög állító kapcsoló, de nem igazán foglalkoztak vele (és a középállás is szar helyen van emiatt jelenleg):

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...6&postcount=29

Nem baj, minél többször látják, talán valakinek eszébe jut kicserélni.
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 05-24-2011, 07:16 PM
Absolut Absolut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 25
Default

realistic or non realistic...blablabla , is its realistic that my reargunner can only shot when not moving, is it realistic that we all fly with no antropomorph, is it realistic that i alwaysm lost sound , is it realistic that the bombs now droping like darts, is it realistic that i can bail out under a second in any position, is it realistic...blablabla.
i payed 69euros, and i play a well made accurate game that impressed with its option to set.(now a lot of them works well)
But i do not accept that some tolds thats realistic and dont talk about put any option for it, after i played it for a long time now.
OK, im seriously playing since the begining of il2, i never had to be posting like this, but someone brutaly handed with my messerschmitt 109, its no virgin any more.
Gentleman is that the way u give us performance?




no more propitch on this controls, is that ok?
im not amused any more, to spend time to fly my 109, its urs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.