Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-23-2011, 03:22 AM
Troll2k Troll2k is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 722
Default

So what is difference between the Radeon Pro settings and CCC settings?They look the same to me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2011, 04:13 AM
roadczar roadczar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troll2k View Post
So what is difference between the Radeon Pro settings and CCC settings?They look the same to me.
About twice the frame rates.

It uses DX10 crossfire profile of the "Lost Planet Extreme Condition" and gives a higher priority to the thread.

Last edited by roadczar; 05-23-2011 at 04:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2011, 04:29 AM
Kankkis Kankkis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 584
Default

I can say this WORKS like a beuty, i got steady 60FPS over London and really ZERO stutter, Little stutter when maxed.

How you get that MVPU=1 settings??

Thank you roadczar for find.

EDIT:
My only problem is i see sometimes when start the game terrible flashing whole my screen.

Nice to see Londow without stuttering and no rubberband at all, smooth as butter.

Kankkis

Last edited by Kankkis; 05-23-2011 at 05:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2011, 05:11 AM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

Did anyone try linking a 3dmark profile to Launcher somehow?
Drivers should be optimized for benchmark utilities like 3dmark pretty aggressively.

In ArmA you could rename arma.exe to 3dmark.exe and have a significant performance boost, x-fire working, etc.
Steam does not allow to rename Launcher.exe but there could be another way to load 3dmark profile.

ps. Where the above mentioned Lost Planet profile comes from? Is it built in this utility or should be downloaded from their site?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2011, 05:14 AM
Kankkis Kankkis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ataros View Post
Did anyone try linking a 3dmark profile to Launcher somehow?
Drivers should be optimized for benchmark utilities like 3dmark pretty aggressively.

In ArmA you could rename arma.exe to 3dmark.exe and have a significant performance boost, x-fire working, etc.
Steam does not allow to rename Launcher.exe but there could be another way to load 3dmark profile.

ps. Where the above mentioned Lost Planet profile comes from? Is it built in this utility or should be downloaded from their site?
Come with the utility
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2011, 07:44 AM
322Sqn_Dusty's Avatar
322Sqn_Dusty 322Sqn_Dusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 214
Default

Sounds promising. Going to give it a try when back from work.
__________________
Q9550 @ 3.4
Coolermaster 850w PSu
Sapphire HD6970 2GB
8Gb Ram B.Dragon
Kingston SSD
Win 7 64
Logitech G940
Saitek Quadrant

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2011, 07:47 AM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 322Sqn_Dusty View Post
Sounds promising. Going to give it a try when back from work.
Please share your results. I am thinking of adding a 2nd 4890 as a temporary solution till nextgen cards introduced later this year.

OT: How much you managed to OC your 4890s by the way?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-23-2011, 10:40 AM
Longbone Longbone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadczar View Post
Here is a tweak using RadeonPro utility: http://www.radeonpro.info/en-US/

In “The Black Death.trk” using "very high" settings my FPS went up from average: 20, max: 64 to average: 42 / max: 122. All 4 GPUs are at about 75%.

The only issue encountered was some menu and mini-map (multi player) corruption. EDIT: Disabling API monitoring in RadeonPro setting resolved corruption issues.

Your experience may differ!

Here are the settings:





You can also download these settings from my website:

Click Save As
Congratulations! +100% Nice work!

Keep it up!

Last edited by Longbone; 05-23-2011 at 10:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-23-2011, 11:46 AM
roadczar roadczar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Different cards may require different settings.

I also had issues with flickering using some of profiles. For those with flickering problems be sure to try different crossfire profiles. Remember DX9 cards may not work with DX10 profiles...


Also, try disabling API monitoring. This helped with menu corruption.


(Added this to the first post as well)

Last edited by roadczar; 05-23-2011 at 12:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-24-2011, 10:02 AM
naz naz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 152
Default

ok Guys, did some more testing...mixed bag of results unfortunately.

I tried some different profiles as roadczar suggested and ran the blackdeath track with the following results:
Lost Planet Extreme Condition (DX 10) - FPS avg 51 but flickering
Call of Juarez - Flickering
Unreal 3 - no improvement of FPS (41 avg)
Crisis - Flickering
Dirt 2 - no flickering and avg FPS of 52 (decent increase)

All above in True Full screen, V-sync off. Also ran msi afterburner to check both GPUs on my 5970 were being used.

I also did a run of the track in Pseudo mode, with the Dirt2 profile enabled (just to see what happened) ... avg fps was back down to the standard 41 and msi afterburner showed only one GPU being used.

So from that, the Dirt2 profile seemed to do the trick. Whilst actually flying a mission however, it was unfortunately a different story.

I have a variation of the QMB mission "Airfield Attack - Mansfield" set up for testing. Whilst playing with the true full screen and the RadeonPro settings, performance seemed to be more sluggish with stutters down low...avg fps in the low 30s. I had also turned on v-sync and triple buffer to eliminate the track IR tearing.

I went back to my usual Pseudo mode settings and disabled the RadeonPro (back to how I have my game after the latest patch/hotfix) and whilst flying the same mission, everything seemed a lot smoother again, minimal stutters and avg fps in the high 30s.

Don't know what to say really, I wish I could get the same performance increases that roadczar and Kankkis are reporting but it aint happening at my end...well, not when actually flying a mission anyway.

I suspect I am applying Radeonpro correctly as I got the different performance results (flickering/no flickering etc) when trying the different profiles so I think I have done things correctly.

Thanks anyway guys, but it looks like I will just have to wait for official updates for any further improvements on my rig.

Thankfully, I get decent performance with Pseudo mode as is (albeit with some tearing) so i am still having fun with the game.

specs: intel i7 950 @ 3.8, 6Gig 1600 DDR3 Ram, ATI 5970, win 7 64 bit, track ir 4.

Usual In game settings (Psuedo mode): 1920x1200 (Native), Epilspy off, SSAO off, V-sync off, Building amount High, Building textures medium, Textures High (down from original), no AA ..everything else on and maxed.

Last edited by naz; 05-24-2011 at 11:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.