Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2011, 06:36 PM
roadczar roadczar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbone View Post
Hi mate,
to do this my idea would be buy 6GB more RAM
I think you have 3 Slots free then run a RAMDISK and move your Steam+
Game on it.This would give you a few more frames or little bit higher settings.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...hlight=ramdisk

I've running a 5GB Ramdisk with entire Steam on it and it gave me about 10FPS more over London, it's only a suggestion.

Cheers
Thanks! With RAID 0 SSD drive access is less of a bottleneck, but I will add memory when I go to Intel LGA2011 Socket, Q4/2011

Last edited by roadczar; 05-20-2011 at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-20-2011, 06:48 PM
l3uLLDoZeR l3uLLDoZeR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 113
Default

Looks sweet man...I think those GPU's are worth more than my car, nice rig!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-20-2011, 10:08 PM
roadczar roadczar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by l3uLLDoZeR View Post
Looks sweet man...I think those GPU's are worth more than my car, nice rig!
Thanks. Still a lot cheaper than buying cars and motorcycles!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-20-2011, 07:18 PM
Longbone Longbone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadczar View Post
Thanks! With RAID 0 SSD drive access is less of a bottleneck, but I will add memory when I go to Intel LGA2011 Socket, Q4/2011
Wow!
Nice future very advanced Quad-Channel Memory PCI-Express-3.0 X68 or X79
are they using DDR3 ?

I'm also running Raid 0 but only with 2xOCZ AgilityII 60GB
and only 1 100GB partition left 20GB free for selfrepair actions, but RAMDISK is about 40 times faster

Cheers
EDIT Hotfix is coming
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=23086

Last edited by Longbone; 05-20-2011 at 07:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-20-2011, 10:13 PM
roadczar roadczar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbone View Post
Wow!
Nice future very advanced Quad-Channel Memory PCI-Express-3.0 X68 or X79
are they using DDR3 ?
DDR3 from what I've read, but as you pointed out it will be quad channel.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-20-2011, 10:31 PM
Bryan21cag Bryan21cag is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 183
Default

Cheers man for getting some great performance

I am just curious though I am getting not even close to the same performance and was wondering if you were having the same issue prior to the patch?

I am attaching my two photos of what My GPU's were doing in both tests and now I am starting to worry that its either my set up or my cards that are under powered.

Just wanted to get your opinion. Thanks very much and grats again on getting that kind of performance.

Both Tests were performed at 1920x1080 on a 40' HD TV. I still get that GPU1 clipping and only minor improvement in GPU2 performance.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-20-2011, 11:24 PM
roadczar roadczar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan21cag View Post
Cheers man for getting some great performance

I am just curious though I am getting not even close to the same performance and was wondering if you were having the same issue prior to the patch?

I am attaching my two photos of what My GPU's were doing in both tests and now I am starting to worry that its either my set up or my cards that are under powered.

Just wanted to get your opinion. Thanks very much and grats again on getting that kind of performance.

Both Tests were performed at 1920x1080 on a 40' HD TV. I still get that GPU1 clipping and only minor improvement in GPU2 performance.
Before the last (14550) patch the sim was unflyable on my rig at any graphic settings. The issue was not with frame rates it was the stuttering.
My guess, with your rig at 1920x1080 on medium settings you should be getting average of 40 - 50 FPS. One thing I've noticed even with 14550 patch that disabling mirror significantly improved the smoothness of rendering.

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-20-2011, 11:52 PM
Bryan21cag Bryan21cag is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadczar View Post
Before the last (14550) patch the sim was unflyable on my rig at any graphic settings. The issue was not with frame rates it was the stuttering.
My guess, with your rig at 1920x1080 on medium settings you should be getting average of 40 - 50 FPS. One thing I've noticed even with 14550 patch that disabling mirror significantly improved the smoothness of rendering.

Cheers!
Thanks I was being dumb i forgot to update my ATI drivers. Once i updated to 11.5 I got almost the same performance that the OP for this thread did almost his cards are better then mine so I got just a bit more stutter with everything on but MAN was it fun to fly a complete mission With just a bit of tweaking im sure i can get it to run smooth as silk 50+ fps and with future improvements may even be able to run it with full graphics switches (fingers crossed) wooooooot if feels good to be back in the air again

here is my performance single Brit campaign mission with everything on full 1920x1080.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-21-2011, 12:01 AM
Longbone Longbone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 49
Default

Have you tested 14588 already?
Think it is a little bit smoother, 1 step in the right direction
Tomorrow I will start more testing,it's 2:00Am now

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-21-2011, 12:44 AM
roadczar roadczar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbone View Post
Have you tested 14588 already?
Think it is a little bit smoother, 1 step in the right direction
Tomorrow I will start more testing,it's 2:00Am now

Cheers
Yes, in fact I feel like I should be getting paid.

Here is something weird. At default medium settings my frame rates range 50-60. If I change anything like lowering amount of buildings from medium to low my average FPS drop below 25!

We are still in beta - my offshore developers in India do better testing LOL.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.