Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-08-2011, 05:26 PM
Pyrres Pyrres is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Schlageter View Post
I would like to upgrade my computer.

Could someone from Maddox Games give me the specifications of their computer that ran a 40-50 airplane combat scenario at low level over London?

Thanks
My pc ran 80+ planes over London plus flak quite nicely . So no problems on this end. This is the same thing that was with the original IL2, you need a good computer to run it at acceptable levels of detail and AC number in the air.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-08-2011, 05:44 PM
kimosabi kimosabi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
the most expensive one you can afford at the moment, i wouldn't spend 5 cents on any upgrades until this game is finished. Good luck though!
werd yo!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-08-2011, 06:05 PM
Kurfurst Kurfurst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
I believe Mr. Schlageter was having a bit of a joke here.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-08-2011, 10:10 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Exactly Kurfurst.

We don't always agree, but when we do it's 100%.

__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-08-2011, 10:35 PM
Heliocon Heliocon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squidgyb View Post
Right now an i7 2600k clocked to 4.5GHz and upwards coupled with a GTX 580 is pretty much the top end, because radeons have all sorts of problems and that CPU will be the fastest available.

addman is correct though - there's no point upgrading right now. tidying up the code and a generation or two of hardware will be what it takes to play coD with lots of planes/city scapes below.

For some kind of reference - I tried to max out one of the new quick missions last night - I had 116 'planes in the air - I wouldn't call it playable, but neither was it a complete slideshow. That was with max settings all round, except SSAO and epilepsy filter, at 1920x1200.
There are faster cpus than that, they just cost an arm and a leg.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-08-2011, 10:42 PM
ATAG_Doc ATAG_Doc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: A brothel in the Mekong Delta
Posts: 1,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Schlageter View Post
I would like to upgrade my computer.

Could someone from Maddox Games give me the specifications of their computer that ran a 40-50 airplane combat scenario at low level over London?

Thanks
as much as you can stand. this is the way it should be.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-08-2011, 10:54 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
I believe Mr. Schlageter was having a bit of a joke here.
Nope.The game must have been performing OK on the MG computer that tested the finish game before release. What better way to test the game than with a large number of a/c at low level over London. So, it must have been performing OK for MG to take the May Day holiday.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-09-2011, 06:31 AM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Schlageter View Post
Nope.The game must have been performing OK on the MG computer that tested the finish game before release.
They tested the game?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-09-2011, 09:21 AM
JG14_Jagr JG14_Jagr is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Schlageter View Post
I would like to upgrade my computer.

Could someone from Maddox Games give me the specifications of their computer that ran a 40-50 airplane combat scenario at low level over London?

Thanks
I don't know what there's was, but I ran 80 He111's 110's and 109's at 4Km over Londer against my 12 Spitfires and I was getting mid 50's in fps. When it broke down and I went to the deck chasing 109's and 110's it went into the 30's. 1920X1200 All on HIGH with SSAO/EPILEPSY = OFF SHADOWS = OFF.
__________________
MSI P67A-65D
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.2 Gig
8 Gigs Corsair DDR3 1600 RAM
XFX 6970 Video Card
Win7 64 Bit Home Ed
ATI 12.3 Driver Package
WD Caviar 7600 RPM HDD
ATI CCC at DEFAULT settings
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-09-2011, 10:51 AM
uahallie uahallie is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Uther View Post
They tested the game?
lol, Andy!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.