Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-02-2011, 09:22 PM
smellydad smellydad is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Wish I'd waited a few months for a Sandy Bridge

On default high settings, no AA or SSAO etc.

Min - 10

Max - 131

Avg - 59.155

Everything at very high, 8 x AA (supposedly) and SSAO on:

Min - 9

Max - 99

Avg - 48.498

i7 950@3.5GHz
6GB DDR3
GTX580 1.5GB
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-02-2011, 09:24 PM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Everything turned up to full except SSAO off, Epilepsy off, AAx1 @ 1680x1050 on an i5 2500k, 8gb ddr3 1600, 560ti 1gb.

Avg - 53
Max - 127
Min - 15
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-02-2011, 09:52 PM
etzi etzi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 67
Default

Thats all bs, if everybody uses other resolutions and options.

Please fix the settings and resolution for a comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-02-2011, 11:11 PM
lbuchele lbuchele is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Campo Grande/Brasil
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mazex View Post
Sounds good! And the average?
I don't know,I registered the Min and Max looking at the screen,but I need to learn where the damn fraps is storing the data from benchmark.
What's the correct setting to do the MinAvgMax reading?
EDIT:Both Min and Max readings was there for a second,mostly of the time it's around 76 fps, when the Bf 110 are aproaching to atack,48 fps more or less,the bombs exploding around 30 or something

Last edited by lbuchele; 05-02-2011 at 11:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-04-2011, 04:27 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

So - now I got my GTX580 (and all the other stuff accept the Obsidian 650D chassis which will arrive in "two weeks"! Doh!).

Never the less - now I could do the interesting test of throwing in a GTX580 in my old rig to try how CPU limited it is - and YES it sure is


My old setup and score:

Core2Duo E8400@3.3 - GTX275 - 6 GB DDR2 800Mhz - P45Mb
-------------------------------------------------------
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
6851, 218058, 9, 69, 31.418
-------------------------------------------------------

My new setup and score (just swapped the GTX275 for a GTX580 which should be a LOT faster):

Core2Duo E8400@3.3 - GTX580 - 6 GB DDR2 800Mhz - P45Mb
-------------------------------------------------------
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
7230, 217293, 13, 70, 33.273
-------------------------------------------------------

So I gained ~1.9 fps in average

Updated my original post too...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-04-2011, 06:09 PM
Rattlehead Rattlehead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 727
Default

Let us know how it fares if you install the new beta patch. Congrats on the new hardware.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-06-2011, 06:47 AM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattlehead View Post
Let us know how it fares if you install the new beta patch. Congrats on the new hardware.
Thanks

I get 15 min, 78 max and 37 average with the new patch according to my rules - a good improvement. The interesting thing is that I get 60 - 70 fps 500 feet over Dover where I previously was on 30 - 40 (old gpu and 305 patch). The fps increase is awsome! So the limiting factor in the black death track is much less the GPU than in the "real" game...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-07-2011, 02:06 AM
broken pixel broken pixel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: KDWH
Posts: 73
Default

52 64 58.074
XFX6990 @ 990mhZ 1375mhZ

: (
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-07-2011, 04:06 AM
broken pixel broken pixel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: KDWH
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by broken pixel View Post
52 64 58.074
XFX6990 @ 990mhZ 1375mhZ

: (
Forgot to add a screen shot- -

Last edited by broken pixel; 05-07-2011 at 04:09 AM. Reason: Crossfire/SLi/full/Support/Please.... a cough, a cough 6990
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-13-2011, 07:08 PM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

So, now my new rig is ready, score according to the original rules - but with the latest patch:

Specs in sig:

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
14867, 216997, 22, 168, 68.512

An average of 68.5 works for me on high So obviously this game needs a good CPU as the same GPU in my old Core 2 Duo rig was very far from this score...

Updated first post too.
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.5 | GTX580 1.5GB (latest drivers) | P8Z77-V Pro MB | 8GB DDR3 1600 Mhz | SSD (OS) + Raptor 150 (Games) + 1TB WD (Extra) | X-Fi Fatality Pro (PCI) | Windows 7 x64 | TrackIR 4 | G940 Hotas
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.