Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2011, 06:51 PM
kimosabi kimosabi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 439
Default

There's no use going by FM testing as detailed as this one yet. The FM is just as immature as the rest of the game is, so in a year a test like this one should be better suited.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2011, 12:39 AM
Peril Peril is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 78
Default

Does the engine have the capability to output debug data in digital?

Detailed info like rate of turn, G's, RoC, hp, IAS, TAS, boost, rpm etc. all in digital?? This is detailed data invaluable to defining the errors. I find the hp and boost in digital very useful in defining RAM effects at alts etc. Analogue gauges are just to vague to be really definitive, we don't even know if they are calibrated correctly.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-30-2011, 04:41 AM
Peril Peril is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 78
Default

That's useful data on early Spits, thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-27-2011, 02:13 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

I don't know if this ever started or how serious Viper is but I am willing to help with the testing but ONLY if there is some assurance from the development team that it is being taken seriously.

From what I am seeing wider Europe is undertaking a Public Beta test which is adhoc and incredibly disorganised.

So, if we are given genuine co-operation from Luthier & friends, and that we supply genuine reliable information to them to use, then I'm signed up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2011, 08:25 AM
TUCKIE_JG52 TUCKIE_JG52 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kimosabi View Post
There's no use going by FM testing as detailed as this one yet. The FM is just as immature as the rest of the game is, so in a year a test like this one should be better suited.
Of course, but there's also no reason to stay with nothing to do, at least we must know in which atmosfere are we flying... to avoid people whining about bugs that aren't bugs...

Our learning curve is slower than developers speed of work

Last edited by TUCKIE_JG52; 04-29-2011 at 09:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2011, 04:06 PM
kimosabi kimosabi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 439
Default

My learning curve tells me that the mixture issue need to be taken care of, and that the FM needs to provide us with more feedback and certain elements of aircrafts behaviour before a FM test is justified. Otherwise mapping an aircrafts performance envelope will not be correct once the FMs have been changed. They know about those issues and I'm sure they are working on it. I'll say it like this: There's no use taking a Fiat Uno to Nürburgring to test lap times, if the race is classed as a FIA GT. But by all means, if you people need something to do just for the sake of doing it......

Last edited by kimosabi; 04-29-2011 at 04:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2011, 04:09 PM
ivo ivo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 98
Default

Bye see here:
http://www.fourthfightergroup.com/eagles/spit2.html
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.