Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:05 PM
Daniël's Avatar
Daniël Daniël is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider View Post
were the gunsights made by Zeiss?

if so the photography methodology was used... keep both eyes open looking through the view finder
The most German gunsights were made by Revi. The one in Bf 109's are Revis too.
__________________

If you are insecure: use more bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:05 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow View Post
@Krupi: guess what, I tried this indeed yesterday, shifting with mouse to set the view. When I go back to trackir I am automatically shifted back to centre cockpit view. It simply does NOT work. So this advice is useless.
If you are using Track IR then yes it jumps back.

To center the sight with track ir just lean to the left and center track ir. This way when you stop leaning you will be positioned behind the sights.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:08 PM
drewpee drewpee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 427
Default

Not that this helps, but it's pretty neat don't you think?
http://youtu.be/Blem3FlkaMc
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:11 PM
Lixma Lixma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow View Post
Lixma, please go physics and explain it in an understandable way why it should be so. I still don't get it why out of miracle the opposing half of the circle should appear in the middle of nowhere.
Okay try this....

Here's an Apache driver's Helmet Mounted Sight (HMS). It projects the HUD and other stuff into one eye only.



And yet the Apache drivers have two eyes...binocular vision.

So what does the Apache pilot see when he's flying around?

Is it this....?



Or is it this.....?




And so with the Revi.

The Revi is installed on the 109 to project its reticle onto one eye only (the right one in our case).

And yet Luftwaffe pilots has two eyes....binocular vision.

So what would our Luftwaffe pilot have seen while flying around?

Something like this...?




Or this.....?

Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:17 PM
b101uk b101uk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Default

Well all that need to be established is the width of the reflector glass (thus its centre) (which is suspect is wider than >3” (>75mm) ) and the aperture thus FOV of the rectical which will denote if a pilot could use his brain to merge the 2 images (left eye cannot see the rectical when the right can) or if he was required to lean a little &/or close one eye etc.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:18 PM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniël View Post
The most German gunsights were made by Revi. The one in Bf 109's are Revis too.
I could be wrong but revi is a shortened reflex vision? (whatever that was in german)


*Edit...

Reflexvisier
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4

Stand alone Collector's Edition
DCS Series



Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound.

Last edited by Wolf_Rider; 04-21-2011 at 04:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:31 PM
EvilJoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lixma View Post
Or in the middle....BF-110.

Here's a (very) rough mock up of what the 109 pilot would see (assuming he wasn't a Cyclops). Never mind this leaning over to the right nonsense. If CoD wants to be as realistic as possible then this is what we should have.

Why isn't this post getting more love? The 109 gunsight lined up with the gunners right eye and stereoscopic sight compensated for the rest. This really is what a 109 gun sight should display if this SIMULATION is SIMULATING a pilot with TWO EYES.

The fact is, no matter how realistic a sim is, it must compensate at least just a bit for the fact that this simulation is being displayed on a two dimensional display (don't get me started on 3D displays that only use one of the ten visual cues to simulate human stereoscopic vision) with image resolution that falls far below the image quality of the average human with two eyes.

The fact is that a human being with eyesight comparable to viewing the world through the best computer display available on the market wouldn't have the vision requirements to be a combat pilot in WWII seems to be a fact that a lot of people here seem to ignore.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:43 PM
drewpee drewpee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 427
Thumbs up

Well said Evil Joven
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:56 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lixma View Post
Okay try this....

Here's an Apache driver's Helmet Mounted Sight (HMS). It projects the HUD and other stuff into one eye only.



And yet the Apache drivers have two eyes...binocular vision.

So what does the Apache pilot see when he's flying around?

Is it this....?



Or is it this.....?




And so with the Revi.

The Revi is installed on the 109 to project its reticle onto one eye only (the right one in our case).

And yet Luftwaffe pilots has two eyes....binocular vision.

So what would our Luftwaffe pilot have seen while flying around?

Something like this...?




Or this.....?


Comparing a ww2 gunsight to that of a modern helicopter whose operator has to be trained to use the sight like you are showing it very clever!!!
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 04-21-2011, 03:59 PM
EvilJoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
Comparing a ww2 gunsight to that of a modern helicopter whose operator has to be trained to use the sight like you are showing it very clever!!!
It is, because the concept behind both gun sights is nearly identical; the sight is only viewable by one eye and yet, due to the the way the human brain processes stereoscopic vision the image will appear to be displayed in front of both eyes as long as both are open.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.