what would you prefer photo realistic graphics or graphics designed by vangogh

[sorak]

Originally Posted by revelation

photorealistic painting isnt easy, if it was we wouldn't need fotos.

Nothing stopping you from going into the files and making your own textures.

Here, i drew you a plane, i think its pretty artistic so feel free to draw inspiration for aircraft textures.



have fun flying il2: Cliffs of kindergarten art.

+100

[sorak]

Originally Posted by Hatch

LOL all i've seen so far in these threads by RAAAid is that those that acuse him of trolling are in fact behaving as trolls.

Its sad now a days. Have to hear from the "Troll finders" about how people are being 'trolls' almost anywhere you go now.

[MD_Titus]

Originally Posted by Hatch

LOL all i've seen so far in these threads by RAAAid is that those that acuse him of trolling are in fact behaving as trolls.

Raaaid does not troll, and folk get nasty quickly for some odd reason.

Originally Posted by pupo162

welcome to the banana raid!


you were my favorite at UBI. dont let the trolls in here get you down.

+1

Originally Posted by sorak

Its sad now a days. Have to hear from the "Troll finders" about how people are being 'trolls' almost anywhere you go now.

But that's because people behave like that a lot easier and quicker. And so, folk are behaving like trolls.

They don't have to comment.

[jibo]

the guy is pulling his bull into the official feed back topic

i had launcher crashes, i fixed it with the regedit fix, nvidia cards

man whats people about

im playing with my low end pc and really enjoying destroying engines by putting them to the limit

for me its a matter of playing over sea and if i want i can get 80 fps by 400*300 resolution

of course i cant play over land so i just play over the sea by now

when they fix the buildings problems my rig will suffice and instead of spending two hundred on gpu ill spend 75 on collectors edition, i want that map badly

regedit fix ?? which one the old refresh fix for CRTs ??

this is not a sandpit, you 'll be tracked down as well, if you support this kind of behavior

[proton45]

I like the grafix the way they are...maybe they could use a little tweaking, but photo realism just doesn't work. At 10,000 feet the satellite photos look great, but once you get down to ground level they look like big dots...or blobs, or rubbish. So far technology hasn't tackled the issue of scaling up the detail. Their is just no way that any computer could contain the information needed to model the whole map to photo realistic standards right down to "the random building" at any "random location"...anyway.

Nice to see ya again Raaaid.

p.s. Didn't we have this conversation a couple years ago (at the zoo)?

[ATAG_Doc]

Originally Posted by raaaid

i think this hardware madness is taken us down the path of photorealism

well photorealistic paintings most times are worth nothing, its the artistic paintings which often are invaluable

now games are an art, why is it not like painting and be something artistic instead of boring ultra realism

i dont want realistic clouds, i see them all the time

now dogfighting at dusk on an artistic pink sky

oh boy that would be cool

I love clouds. Unicorns and glider to!!

[Friendly_flyer]

Actually, I wouldn't mind a game that let my fly through scenery from art. Imagine skirting the spires of a Martinesque castles, frolic in the Arcadian sky in an O'Connor painting, or enjoy a flight in the dramatic light German Romanticism!







Or what about following the river across dramatic waterfalls or struggle to find a place to put down your kite in front of the brownish hues of Thomas Cole storm: