Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: What should be IL2: CoD's primary focus?
Cliffs of Dover should focus on realism 250 95.06%
Cliffs of Dover should focus on accesibility 13 4.94%
Voters: 263. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2011, 11:34 AM
ubermachtig ubermachtig is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

Accessibility can be reached with proper difficulty settings options. Turn off the more advanced options = more accessible All on = hard core. Simple.
Exactly, that would be the best solution to satisfy everybody. I don't mind if they want to keep the electrical stuff for those who need it, but I'd like to have the full realism option available as well. Letting these systems work parallel upon the demand of the player is probably a better thing than completely overhauling the current system.

Last edited by ubermachtig; 04-18-2011 at 11:35 AM. Reason: Grammar
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-18-2011, 12:34 PM
SYN_Flashman SYN_Flashman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 48
Default

I voted for the realism BUT there is no reason why both cannot be accomodated. Design the sim around realism but include less complex system/FM/DM models to help those new to flight sims etc.

In fact, its pretty important that newer players and left completely at the mercy of radiators/carb cutout/propellor settings etc to avoid putting them off. Its in everyones interest that this game does well. By making the realism scalable anyone from novice to 'expert' can enjoy what promises to be an excellent sim. Scdalable difficulty is a feature of most sims and this is the same, however the underlying sim should be as realistic as it is feasible to make a deskstop simulation of flying.

TBH I use simple settings when testing my system to try and get it stable. I want to be looking at the FPS etc not my temperatures! Though personally I do prefere 'full real' online.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.