Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2011, 09:06 AM
Zappatime Zappatime is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wakefield UK
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cherkasov54 View Post




are you supposed to click or unclick the SSAO box?
Tick SSAO box for better looking graphics, but with a hit on performance, I think unticked gives a reduction in graphic quality compared with the normal graphic level pre-patch, if you get my meaning.
__________________
__________________________________________________ ________________________________
W7 64Bit/Q9650 @ 3.7Ghz/8Gb Ram/Gigabyte SuperOverClocked GTX580/Creative X-Fi/Dell Ultrascan 24" @ 1920x1200
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2011, 09:09 AM
Moggy's Avatar
Moggy Moggy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 272
Default

Some fantastic shots there guys! Love the window reflection screenshot, very clever.
__________________
Keep calm and carry on

http://www.tangmerepilots.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2011, 10:32 AM
Rickusty Rickusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rome, Total Wa... ehm, Italy
Posts: 115
Default

I don't know why, but I've always loved the quirkiness of the Defiant.
It's a cool looking plane IMO, and the idea behind it was something "new".

Somehow , in the night fighter role, it anticipated the German Schräge Musik concept.
I reckon it was quite effective in that role too during BoB.

Cheers
Rick
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2011, 10:36 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickusty View Post
I don't know why, but I've always loved the quirkiness of the Defiant.
It's a cool looking plane IMO, and the idea behind it was something "new".

Somehow , in the night fighter role, it anticipated the German Schräge Musik concept.
I reckon it was quite effective in that role too during BoB.

Cheers
Rick
LOL how is it new, its a monoplane equivalent of the Bristol Fighter. Nothing new about it just an old idea on a new aircraft and it didn't work... at least the bristol fighter had forward firing guns as well as a rear gunner
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2011, 01:43 PM
Moggy's Avatar
Moggy Moggy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
LOL how is it new, its a monoplane equivalent of the Bristol Fighter. Nothing new about it just an old idea on a new aircraft and it didn't work... at least the bristol fighter had forward firing guns as well as a rear gunner
The real unfortunate thing was...the Defiant's planned successor, the P.96's were never put into production. They would of been armed with 2 or 4 wing mounted 20mm cannon (depending on the model), in addition to the 4 x .303 mahine gun turret. They would of been powered by either the 2,300 HP Napier Sabre NS6SM engine (P.96B) with an estimated maximum speed of 392 MPH at 21,000 ft or the 2,300 HP Bristol Centaurus CE45M engine (P.96D) with an estimated maximum speed of 389 MPH at 21,000 ft. All that remains are some plans and a few wooden models.
__________________
Keep calm and carry on

http://www.tangmerepilots.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2011, 02:04 PM
Rickusty Rickusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rome, Total Wa... ehm, Italy
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
LOL how is it new, its a monoplane equivalent of the Bristol Fighter. Nothing new about it just an old idea on a new aircraft and it didn't work... at least the bristol fighter had forward firing guns as well as a rear gunner
The idea of getting a battery of machine guns on the back wasn't actually new, you're right
But the Bristol fighter had forward firing machine guns; it was conceived as a pure fighter, (the forward MGs being the primary weapons) while the Defiant had all its armament on its back, and was conceived as an anti-bomber.
A new idea in fighter design development.

We all know how things went wrong with it... but I've always liked weird looking planes of that era.
I have a soft spot for the Roc too I must admit, and the Fulmar, the Whitley, the Hampden.
How they say it... "beauty is in the eye of the beholder."

Cheers
Rick
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.