Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-12-2011, 11:08 PM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 123-Wulf-123 View Post
... the WC crowd changed the rules to knobble 110s flying together as teams.
What rules were changed to do that?
__________________
DIY uni-joint / hall effect sensor stick guide:
http://www.mycockpit.org/forums/cont...ake-a-joystick
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-12-2011, 11:14 PM
123-Wulf-123 123-Wulf-123 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 190
Default

The rule that didn't allow us to fly it.

Because we were rolling up the missions in no time flat.

And the bloody Spitfairies whined because we kept blasting them out of the sky becuase the clownasses kept attacking 110s and flying in front of them........

The rule that when they brought it in meant many WC veterans left WC..... THAT RULE.

Ask Oktoberfest.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-12-2011, 11:16 PM
123-Wulf-123 123-Wulf-123 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by *Buzzsaw* View Post
Actually what we are seeing from your comments is a 'gamer' congratulating himself on getting an aircraft with an unrealistic advantage, and then whining when the true facts are presented.

For those of us who prefer to think CLIFFS OF DOVER is what was promised, ie. a "SIMULATION", pointing out instances where an aircraft has an ahistorical advantage is simply good feedback.

Untwist yer knickers and get a life lol
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-12-2011, 11:55 PM
lbuchele lbuchele is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Campo Grande/Brasil
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc_uk View Post
You proberly had everything set on easy
And you dont eat spits for lunch, you might for breakfast, but not lunch
I don't fly on easy,but I'm not using CEM,because a just don't have the time enough to learn it,yet...
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-13-2011, 02:46 AM
Lololopoulos Lololopoulos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Beijing, China; Columbus, OH
Posts: 240
Default

now that i'm reading this post i can't wait to play this game. I need april 26 to come faster.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-13-2011, 03:50 AM
Frequent_Flyer's Avatar
Frequent_Flyer Frequent_Flyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, IL-US
Posts: 166
Default

The majority of the Luftwaffe losses in WW II in both men and equipment were at the hands of the Western Allies. No matter the tactics or aircraft employeed by the Luftwaffe the losses became unsustainable and ultimately had no impact on the wars final outcome. In addition, the 109 and the Spitfire were both poor performers, both carried a thimbleful of fuel at could not land a knock out punch to it's advesary when the opportunity presented itself.
The squadron with the most victories for the RAF, in the battle of Britian, was the Polish pilots of 303,- 126 confirmed. They only were allowed to participate in the secnd half of the battle. The majority of these victories were scored in Hurricanes. In fact I beleive the majority of the total number of RAF victories in BOB were scored in the lowly Hurricane.
Supporting the argument , the pilot has much more of an impact on an egagement than the aircraft.

Last edited by Frequent_Flyer; 04-13-2011 at 03:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 04-13-2011, 03:55 AM
lbuchele lbuchele is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Campo Grande/Brasil
Posts: 285
Default

Yes,but the Hurricane was responsible for 60% or more the total number of english fighters too...
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 04-13-2011, 03:56 AM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Overmodeled LOL! Try some turn n' burn in it and then accelerate away, slow as a snail, just like all the accounts. It turns pretty good, bad roll rate, good speed, horrible acceleration and I love it!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 04-13-2011, 04:08 AM
lbuchele lbuchele is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Campo Grande/Brasil
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triggaaar View Post
This doesn't sound good. As others have said, it wasn't good enough as a fighter, and that's not because it had to fly slowly next to the bombers, it just wasn't as good as the Spit or Hurricane.

And the Hurricane, a pig? Sounds like you've been playing too much IL2 without reading any facts.
You can't,naturally,to fight in equal terms neither with the Spit or the Hurricane in a turn fight.
Not even dream about it.You have to maintain your speed at all costs and use cannons and MG fire in snapshots or better yet if you are a better deflection shooter than me...
Something I have noticed is that sometimes you CAN win a turn fight with a particular Spit.
It's like it had a real bad pilot inside, I don't know if is just a feeling that I had or somebody already experienced this ingame?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-13-2011, 04:28 AM
adonys adonys is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Default

You guys throwing numbers against Luftwaffe and stating how badly were the brits outnumbered during BoB and how heroically were they doing forget your facts:
- actually, you can't be so stupid to count bombers in that comparison, I assume it was a mistake from your part
- Luftwaffe fighters had less than 10 (actually around 5) combat minutes over Britain due to the lack of fuel tanks (which actually counted as the major reason for the BoB's outcome)
- each bailing out Luftwaffe pilot was a loss (PoW), compared with the brit pilots who could fly the next day again
- brits fighters acting as free fighters, while german one were mostly forced to fly as escrots
- the local superiority achieved by the brits fighters due to the use of radar and Center Command operational management

You actually also forget that the brits were those starting the civil targets bombing campaign (the night raid on Berlin), which outraged Hitler who changed the strategical objectives of the BoB campaign in order to respond to the british outrageous behavior.

You also forget that there were the exact words of the british command leaders saying that the german campaign would have continued with the initial strategical targets, they would have been forced to admit defeat in less than 2 weeks, as they actually were right on the edge.

It's quite strange to see how history is modeled by the victors even in our media revolution times, and how easily people are forgetting the real facts of what happened right under their very eyes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.