![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Once you had your time on the internet, you know them all - and you can pretty accurately predict what's coming next. Sigh. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I realize that the game has very highly detailed objects and given that I don't have the game I can't speak to the actual options but IL-2 always gave the ability to turn down the details.
Do you have to run at such high levels of complexity?
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i agree with the op here. 4096 is un-neceesary, its adding an exponential affect to the performance decrease. it simply is not required and its an extravagance. optimise please.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ok guys....to end chit chat, the facts:
1) game currently uses very high resolutions (pilot etc.), poligons/objects for ground units, buildings etc...nice to have high details but currently even supercomputers have performance issues with so detailed landscape objects-units.... 2) Im not able to run this game smoothly on my rig which is far beyond recommended (even although i have good avg fps, but we all now thats not always enough for smooth running if the sim is not optimised well) 3) I bought this sim as Olegs fan and as one of the first to fly original, back in 2001 4) im not a troll, whiner or sick fanboy....I like sims and supportED Oleg, but 1C advertised this sim via videos and other material where poor performance was never mentioned.... 5) why is strange if I want to fly a sim I bought and that is on more than decent rig....currently i cant.... development of modern sims is not easy, I know, but if you concentrate 95% of resources on eyecandy, features and FModels....and very little on OPTIMISATION....youll have what we have now with COD.... I have no doubts devs or moders will optimise the sim....but when....I can wait, no probs, but nobody told us we will have such probs with performance.....this is beyond believable...even the poorly optimised ROF had less issues...so either they didnt want to tell us or they never tested this sim properly...its hardly believable beta testers didnt report performance issues.... look at the medina`s topic and that is only a small part of the story.... Last edited by Tvrdi; 04-10-2011 at 10:37 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
works fine for me, maybe you need to accept it's just you and maybe a few others having some problems....for what reason? who knows, but constantly attacking the sim is just silly.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nobody is attacking......so you have smooth gameplay and 50+ FPS? Without mods? Specs?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What is strange that you, as we all, waited so long to play it and now heaven falls because you have to wait maybe a few more weeks to play it without problems.
See the money you've spent for this sim as a investment into the future. I, for my part, am shure this money is well spent for the fun i expect to have. Even in this, not so perfect, state, this game made the classic IL2 boring for me. No way to go back, except when i have to, flying with my squad.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maybe-baby
btw say this to new customers....unimaginable...and whats about (lost?) good reputaition of maddox?....who cares for me.....but others...masses? New customers. etc...ROF had less probs regarding performance but still, they needed more than a year to optimise...We will se how many patience you all will have..... Last edited by Tvrdi; 04-10-2011 at 10:48 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|