Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-10-2011, 08:55 PM
Redroach's Avatar
Redroach Redroach is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvrdi View Post
No mate. Initial post was about too complex land objects...thats all....then you found your "target" for little private flame/bash war....in fact you want this thread to be locked because you think this will save devs from the true...
you can do some many things, to help them, as fan of this sim..rather than this...
You're constantly seeding hate with these threads. If you want to get rid of your copy of CoD, fine, put it up on ebay, sell it to a friend who actually likes Flightsims etc. But no, you keep coming back here, being jealous of how other people enjoy CoD and you really hate that. So, inflammatory thread no. 6331 sees the light of day, yet you accuse others of starting the flames.
Once you had your time on the internet, you know them all - and you can pretty accurately predict what's coming next. Sigh.
  #2  
Old 04-10-2011, 09:05 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

I realize that the game has very highly detailed objects and given that I don't have the game I can't speak to the actual options but IL-2 always gave the ability to turn down the details.

Do you have to run at such high levels of complexity?
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
  #3  
Old 04-10-2011, 09:51 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i agree with the op here. 4096 is un-neceesary, its adding an exponential affect to the performance decrease. it simply is not required and its an extravagance. optimise please.
  #4  
Old 04-10-2011, 10:25 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ok guys....to end chit chat, the facts:

1) game currently uses very high resolutions (pilot etc.), poligons/objects for ground units, buildings etc...nice to have high details but currently even supercomputers have performance issues with so detailed landscape objects-units....
2) Im not able to run this game smoothly on my rig which is far beyond recommended (even although i have good avg fps, but we all now thats not always enough for smooth running if the sim is not optimised well)
3) I bought this sim as Olegs fan and as one of the first to fly original, back in 2001
4) im not a troll, whiner or sick fanboy....I like sims and supportED Oleg, but 1C advertised this sim via videos and other material where poor performance was never mentioned....
5) why is strange if I want to fly a sim I bought and that is on more than decent rig....currently i cant....

development of modern sims is not easy, I know, but if you concentrate 95% of resources on eyecandy, features and FModels....and very little on OPTIMISATION....youll have what we have now with COD....
I have no doubts devs or moders will optimise the sim....but when....I can wait, no probs, but nobody told us we will have such probs with performance.....this is beyond believable...even the poorly optimised ROF had less issues...so either they didnt want to tell us or they never tested this sim properly...its hardly believable beta testers didnt report performance issues....
look at the medina`s topic and that is only a small part of the story....

Last edited by Tvrdi; 04-10-2011 at 10:37 PM.
  #5  
Old 04-10-2011, 10:34 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

works fine for me, maybe you need to accept it's just you and maybe a few others having some problems....for what reason? who knows, but constantly attacking the sim is just silly.
  #6  
Old 04-10-2011, 10:38 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
works fine for me, maybe you need to accept it's just you and maybe a few others having some problems....for what reason? who knows, but constantly attacking the sim is just silly.
nobody is attacking......so you have smooth gameplay and 50+ FPS? Without mods? Specs?
  #7  
Old 04-10-2011, 10:38 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

What is strange that you, as we all, waited so long to play it and now heaven falls because you have to wait maybe a few more weeks to play it without problems.
See the money you've spent for this sim as a investment into the future.
I, for my part, am shure this money is well spent for the fun i expect to have.
Even in this, not so perfect, state, this game made the classic IL2 boring for me.
No way to go back, except when i have to, flying with my squad.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #8  
Old 04-10-2011, 10:42 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
nobody is attacking......so you have smooth gameplay and 50+ FPS? Without mods? Specs?
yes it is smooth and good fps (around 50 average) with no mods and everything turned to max and resolution is 1680x1050, over london I do get some slow down on same settings, I also have a GTX470 card.
  #9  
Old 04-10-2011, 10:45 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
....maybe a few more weeks to play it without problems.
maybe-baby

btw say this to new customers....unimaginable...and whats about (lost?) good reputaition of maddox?....who cares for me.....but others...masses? New customers. etc...ROF had less probs regarding performance but still, they needed more than a year to optimise...We will se how many patience you all will have.....

Last edited by Tvrdi; 04-10-2011 at 10:48 PM.
  #10  
Old 04-10-2011, 10:53 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvrdi View Post
maybe-baby

btw say this to new customers....unimaginable...and whats about (lost?) good reputaition of maddox?....who cares for me.....but others...masses? New customers. etc...ROF had less probs regarding performance but still, they needed more than a year to optimise...We will se how many patience you all will have.....
It is so touching that in the middle of your relentless negative whining that you still care about the good reputation of Maddox. Sorry I doubted your sincerity.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.