Propeller IS visible ...

[Jotaele]

When i was talking about propeler brightness i was thinking in that.


Pls, ingnore the plane whre the prop is used, ,not a warbird precisely...

[322Sqn_Dusty]

Indeed the situation is different and a camera 'sees' other things then the MK1 Eyeball.

It's filmed by me with a Panasonic TZ-10 (HD res). The field is EHMZ the Netherlands. Higher rpm is less visible and on rpm change the illusion of rotating plays part. Overall it stays vague.


>>Pls, ingnore the plane whre the prop is used, ,not a warbird precisely...

How do you get a picture of the new Dutch combatplane? We ditched the JSF for this version...

[Jotaele]

then, how are your impresions about clods's propeller vs your experience in tiguermoth?
Btw, nice camera, you should share the film somewhere.
About hte secret plane, it was hidden under a newspaper in the street, but wind left it uncovered , so the picture was made.

[bongodriver]

Thx, but i dont think that a photo or movie is usefull here, due than depending of expusore/light conditions, ISO etc, the visible effect is diferent that human eye can see.Anyway its a great picture. Love the dirty look

Plus a still shot will only show blurred blades and not the entire prop disc.



in my experience flying vintage aircraft I would say the props are just fine, they are not totally invisible but they are barely noticeable, only when you have a clear view of the entire prop disc are you aware of the slight darkening where the disc is.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

Plus a still shot will only show blurred blades and not the entire prop disc.

Not if the photographer knows what he is doing...

[bongodriver]

Not if the photographer knows what he is doing...

No arguing with that.......I'm just a pilot

[322Sqn_Dusty]

About the Moth, It's very nice done with the CoD version, handeling can't be compared because i don't feel the plane with my x52. It's very detailed.And shaking due wind and engine get's close.
I agree that a still shot is just a moment in time, the props irl are as stated above, just a slight difference in view and barely noticeble from the cockpit.

[scissorss]

The props in game look how they do to the naked eye. However, I would like to see the actual props when you pause or drastically slow down time. Not a major issue and there is plenty more to be done, but sometime down the road. I know Luthier said we may never see this happen. But a guy can hope.

[ARGH]

the prop in front of your plane disapears when the rpm's climb. it should dissapear. luthier even stated they may not fix this to comply with some stupid epilepsy rule by ubisoft.

the prop is only visible when you reduce the rpm's. it's that simple. you are fooling yourselves if you think otherwise.

[Flanker35M]

S!

The prop is good as it is now, at least for me. I am not there to stare at a prop but the bogey in the sights IMO no need to "fix" them, more important issues there to battle..