Beta Patch-Good/Bad. All discussions here please.

[JG52Uther]

Originally Posted by Trooper117

The patch is 'beta'.. we have it so we can actualy test it and report any issues so that any other problems on other rigs can be sorted hopefully by the weekend when the new official patch comes out..

Exactly!

[Hveding]

Originally Posted by Cpt.Badger

It took them six (eight ?) years to code the game. Anybody that thinks they will fix this game in a week or two is a bit naive.

6-8 years, is that not more than needed to this game ?
Would say that they are slow... The avarge time for making a BIG game is... 2-4 years ? And these guys use 6-8 years and still not done ?
A week or two... I dont think soo. Would say 1-2 years before it's done ^^

[Doc_uk]

Originally Posted by hoarmurath

Same for me, beside the window mode when not playing at your desktop resolution, no sensible changes.

My dectop res is set at 1920x1080p
im playing game at 1280x720
But like i said, all of my resolutions are now back in game, were as befor, i could only select from 3

[jibo]

so there is some improvement for DX9 GT200/300 cards low res

only 2500k/gtx500 smoothly run this game at 1920

[bluescreen2]

dissapointed. 50€ and hardly to not playable... :/

[BlackbusheFlyer]

Originally Posted by jimbop

Yeah, I'm not complaining... Just curious since my biggest problem was stutters which are improved.

Wow your spec is very similiar to mine and yet I am not seeing anywhere near these performance numbers. Which driver are you using?

[avioni]

why did this game get released when it is not finished. this is the thing that bothers me the most. other than the fact that i bought it and i cant use it.


it's like buying a car with no engine.
like buying a book with blank pages.
like opening my wallet, taking out 50 dollars going to the kitchen flip the trashcan open and throwing the money in it.


feels like they needed the money so they launch it and use part of the money to continue development. in my book this is called a scam.
this is my first IL2 game and i think my first 1c game aswell, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

[No601_Merlin]

Originally Posted by jimbop

I've already posted this question in the beta patch thread but I sense it will get buried pretty quickly in the avalanche of feedback...

Question: should tracks taken pre-patch have performance change post-patch? If so (and I don't see why not) then there is zero FPS change on my rig on a free flight over Dover. Of course, if pre-patch track FPS won't change post-patch then I guess I wasted my time!

Excellent post, I see no difference either.
do you manually take note of these settings and then put them in a spreadsheet ?

[addman]

Originally Posted by Hveding

6-8 years, is that not more than needed to this game ?
Would say that they are slow... The avarge time for making a BIG game is... 2-4 years ? And these guys use 6-8 years and still not done ?
A week or two... I dont think soo. Would say 1-2 years before it's done ^^

Ehr, BIG games often have a MUCH larger development team and a much bigger budget. Also, Gears of War -i.e- doesn't contain super advanced physics, damage modeling (head shots are not advanced DM) and hundreds of historically detailed vehicles and weapons. Can't compare apples with oranges.

[TeeJay82]

went from 3 fps to 20-30 with settings on very high.

still a little way to go with everything but still:

i very much appreciate all your hard work keep it up


system speccs btw:

Cabinet: Silverstone raven 02
Motherboard:Asus Crosshair Folmula IV
PSU: Cooler master Silent gold 1000w
CPU: Amd 1090t clocked to 6 x 3.9ghz /w Coolit vantage alc cpu cooler
Memory: Kingston Hyper x 2333mhz 1.65v 8gb (4x2gb) running at 2000mhz
Hdd1 c:\ OCZ Revodrive 120gb
Hdd2 d:\ 2x WD raptor 10000rpm 600gb in raid 0
GPU: Gainward 580GTX with accelerato xtreme plus cooler oced to 900/2100
Dvd: sony optiarc &%¤%& something