Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-07-2011, 12:34 PM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default Pre vs post-patch track comparison

I've already posted this question in the beta patch thread but I sense it will get buried pretty quickly in the avalanche of feedback...

Question: should tracks taken pre-patch have performance change post-patch? If so (and I don't see why not) then there is zero FPS change on my rig on a free flight over Dover. Of course, if pre-patch track FPS won't change post-patch then I guess I wasted my time!


pre_vs_post_patch by jimb0p, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-07-2011, 12:48 PM
112th_Rossi 112th_Rossi is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 11
Default

You're getting high frame rates anyway! Regardless.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-07-2011, 12:49 PM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 112th_Rossi View Post
You're getting high frame rates anyway! Regardless.
Yeah, I'm not complaining... Just curious since my biggest problem was stutters which are improved.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-07-2011, 12:52 PM
112th_Rossi 112th_Rossi is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 11
Default

I'm pretty convinced that stutters are related to some kind of disk access. I 'feels' like something is being loaded in each time they occur.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-07-2011, 12:55 PM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 112th_Rossi View Post
I'm pretty convinced that stutters are related to some kind of disk access. I 'feels' like something is being loaded in each time they occur.
It could be. Try using a RAM drive if you have enough spare, seems to work for some people. If this makes a difference it will only be in the stuttering, not FPS on which it has no effect.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-07-2011, 08:08 PM
Doc_uk Doc_uk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK, Alton, Hampshire
Posts: 722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 112th_Rossi View Post
I'm pretty convinced that stutters are related to some kind of disk access. I 'feels' like something is being loaded in each time they occur.
Its very strange its over land, and not water, i get good gamplay over warter, but over land its not that good
ive also noticed if you do a fps check over land its only building and trees that have the worst effect,
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2011, 01:09 PM
BlackbusheFlyer BlackbusheFlyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbop View Post
Yeah, I'm not complaining... Just curious since my biggest problem was stutters which are improved.
Wow your spec is very similiar to mine and yet I am not seeing anywhere near these performance numbers. Which driver are you using?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-07-2011, 01:16 PM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackbusheFlyer View Post
Wow your spec is very similiar to mine and yet I am not seeing anywhere near these performance numbers. Which driver are you using?
270.51 BETA but FPS is similar with the stable version. If you haven't already then disable aero theme in win7 and exclude the steam folder from your antivirus.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2011, 01:23 PM
doghous3 doghous3 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 168
Default

I take it the max count was when you was looking at the sky?

I think the mean value is perhaps deceptive. What would you say was the avg performace you was getting?

I might replicate test1 just to see what I get.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-07-2011, 01:29 PM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doghous3 View Post
I take it the max count was when you was looking at the sky?

I think the mean value is perhaps deceptive. What would you say was the avg performace you was getting?

I might replicate test1 just to see what I get.
The mean is not too far off since I spent most of the track looking at the town to stress things a bit.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.