![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() I'm really amazed that those "guys who fly real aircraft with thousands of flight hours" don't get that. But I don't worry there, 1C have their own flight testers. Some of these guys flew or fly the real thing(s), so I definately give more about them than about random internet "flight instructors". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Opitz; 04-06-2011 at 07:43 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Okay, maybe you have turned off the head bounce thingy, where it may be not as obvious, but:
I happen to be a physicist (for real, it's not just a random claim ![]() Now this is less obvious in more modern cockpits, as advances have been made in mounting the engine(s) with dampening elements. The engines are designed to run more vibration-free, too and cockpit instruments, if not already digital, have also been improved, "decoupling" them from airframe vibrations in better ways. It's shouldn't be like 1940 anymore ![]() I'm more and more amazed at the level of detail the developers introduced into CoD and it makes me sad that many of those details are, if not quite convenient, called "bugs" by some users. Don't get me wrong, there are bugs and there are quite a few, but CoD is NOT an arcade game and I really, really hope that Oleg, Luthier & co. stand by their philosophy in striving for realism - as this is the "perk" why the majority of players have fallen in love with the Il-2 line. Last edited by Redroach; 04-06-2011 at 08:33 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If it would only tremble (when starting, turning off, or dives on higher speeds) - OK... But right know it is just one of many little annoying "features" of this sim... |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It wasn't directed against anyone, personally. I just happen to see more and more people reinforcing their claims with that.
But you're right, I should have left out my own statement about being a physicist, too. If I have to "scare away" people by claiming that I'm a "pro" on the matter (I'm not a 'pro' at all on these specific things, it's just general mechanics), I participate in the discussion in a wrong way. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just realised that it might not have been me actually, I re read the entire thread....I guess I'm getting jumpy.....my bad.
in actual fact having re read the post I will withdraw my general statement on this, I think I am on a different wavelength...excuse the pun, of course instruments do bounce in turbulence and in severe engine rough running conditions, and to be honest I was concentrating on an exessive bounce with the RPM needle (this I do feel needs a tweaking) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How about letting them fix the mixture control first before we jump to any conclusions.
Right now, even the auto-mixture on the 109 is causing problems at altitudes above ~3000 meters. It's only shake-free if you turn CEM off. In comparison, it's not that bad at low altitudes when everything is set correctly using CEM. If however the problem still persists after the fix, we can start arguing it to death. (And the fanboys throw sh*t at R/L pilots because they point out obvious mistakes ![]() |
![]() |
|
|