Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-05-2011, 06:52 PM
b101uk b101uk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Default

Viper2000

Its worth remembering the >30lb < 50lb used are designed to replicate the strength of the average right arm trying to pull the stick to the right in a right hand roll, in a left hand roll with the same right arm you can literally double the force applied to the stick in a left hand roll so in the region of 60lb to 100lb or if you use both hands you are realistically looking at up to 150lb both ways and that’s without the affect of adrenalin wile being shot at and Its certainly not undocumented pilots pulling high speed direction and orientation changes etc using both hands.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-05-2011, 07:11 PM
Viper2000 Viper2000 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b101uk View Post
Viper2000

Its worth remembering the >30lb < 50lb used are designed to replicate the strength of the average right arm trying to pull the stick to the right in a right hand roll, in a left hand roll with the same right arm you can literally double the force applied to the stick in a left hand roll so in the region of 60lb to 100lb or if you use both hands you are realistically looking at up to 150lb both ways and that’s without the affect of adrenalin wile being shot at and Its certainly not undocumented pilots pulling high speed direction and orientation changes etc using both hands.
I'm just saying that the 2 charts are in agreement with each other when the different stick forces upon which they are based is taken into account.

I'm not suggesting that either figure is representative of the limit of pilot capability. Indeed, as I have already stated in this thread, you can't measure the limits of capability, and you certainly couldn't do so in a repeatable fashion across a variety of types because you'd see different forces for each as a function of cockpit design etc..
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-05-2011, 07:14 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viper2000 View Post
I already pointed this out in my last post, had you but taken the time to read it...
I don't quite see why are you addressing this to me, as I was commenting on the origin of your 'Spitfire' - which we now know to be a Spit VA with metal ailerons, not a canvas covered one. You're storming a castle with open gates..
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-05-2011, 07:38 PM
Viper2000 Viper2000 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 218
Default

Because I don't think that the fast rolling Spitfire is actually any faster than the other; I think they're basically the same and differ only in the stick forces applied. Therefore I don't think that there's anything particularly "exceptional" about the results.

If you look at the curves in the deflection limited region, you'll see that the roll rates are basically the same, so the difference is simply caused by the different stick forces applied in the tests.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-06-2011, 12:16 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b101uk View Post
Its worth remembering the >30lb < 50lb used are designed to replicate the strength of the average right arm trying to pull the stick to the right in a right hand roll, in a left hand roll with the same right arm you can literally double the force applied to the stick in a left hand roll so in the region of 60lb to 100lb or if you use both hands you are realistically looking at up to 150lb both ways and that’s without the affect of adrenalin wile being shot at and Its certainly not undocumented pilots pulling high speed direction and orientation changes etc using both hands.
Regardless of this 50 lbs is the maximum we can pull in CoD in every direction, I'm afraid.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-06-2011, 08:16 PM
madrebel madrebel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 85
Default

how come nobody is complaining about the unbalanced pitch control of the spitfire? you know, the control being so light that it is possible to exceed CLmax in all conditions of flight if you aren't careful.

instead we're worrying about how much force a pilot hopped up on adrenaline can apply to the heavy aileron but not mentioning how easily that pilot could rip his own wings off if not careful.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-06-2011, 09:17 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

As far as I know that's right...the Spitfire is very well known for having a ludicrously light elevator especially by comparison with its heavy ailerons.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-06-2011, 09:54 PM
madrebel madrebel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 85
Default

indeed and unfortunately its something no sim i have ever played properly models. its like they use one curve for all control inputs. i'm hoping for more from CoD.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-07-2011, 02:03 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

British Hurricane and Spitfire report from October 1940, describing high speed behaviour of the controls.

http://rapidshare.com/files/45631956...tober_1940.rar

* ducks for cover *
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-07-2011, 03:00 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Leg iiiiit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.