Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old 04-02-2011, 01:23 AM
Kikuchiyo Kikuchiyo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paper View Post
LMAO i register just to answer you .....


1)Have you ever play a good game before saying that shit ... ?

2) In your video we can see it is not smooth, and you keep the best point of view in order to have the more fps as possible for the record. ( near house you are not in the cockpit for example )

3) More over spec which are needed, are not enough to run the game well ...

4) In this game there is much bug, there is much not realistic things, menu are horrible, map are horrible (in multiplayer) , the ground in juste a big joke , il-2 1946 is better than this game in many point.

5) My last sentence say everything.
I don't know what they did during 7 years, but the result is juste a big joke for the moment !

6) More over in the collector edition, in the spitfire pilot's note , some page are print 2 times, some page are not print !!!!!!!!!! in the pilot's instruction, they forget to print spitfire information .....

7) I think it is your first air plane game to say things like that ...
Go play il-2 1946 & RoF ...



"So I'm going to prove that statement wrong" ====> OK and you didn't play over london .... LOOOOL. And how many feet did you have during the record ? Everybody know when you are high you can easily play...

More over lot of people can play with lot of air plane, this is not a big problem.

Final world is : FANBOY, get a brain and watch the reality !
1) Define "good game"

2) What's wrong with that?

3) We know the game has optimization issues, but thanks for the reminder.

4) Bugs, no one has refuted that. Opinions = not factual information.

5) Recreated physics for flight models. Extensive research, impressive modeling, and the list goes on.

6) Publisher issue not developer.

7) Each of these games on your list are a) from this developer, and/or b) have been on the market for awhile after dealing with similar issues.

In short your flaming is straw man arguments coupled with opinion and short sighted thinking.

The game needs work, undoubtedly, but calling it a failure after a week of being on the market in an extremely niche market with highly complex issues to deal with is short sighted, and frankly ignorant.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.