Ranters, please.

[cato_larsen]

Originally Posted by ICDP

LOL, I can assure you, the minority will turn into a majority when the western version is released. Do you even have the Russian version?

Ah well. so be it then. It might happen, I will still be here, i will still fly.
Name another game other than IL2:1946 and Cliffs of Dover that will suit this genre. WW2 combat flight sim. It is nothing even close to it...

I am just hoping that in time, this will be as good as it has potential to be....
Cause already it is pretyy damn.... pretty... and feels very good to fly...

[LoBiSoMeM]

I spend A LOT of time reading people of Maddox Games and TD talking about "rigid standards"...

Welllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll... Standards about WHAT?!?!?!

What I can clearly see untill now is something very close of the ANCIENT original IL-2 graphic engine, heavy as hell, with a REAL trouble rendering large towns, stuttering in the SAME WAY OLD IL-2 DOES, etc.

Remember the crap talking about mods?

"Ohhhh... this effect mod don't run well! It's not fulfill the rigid standards!"

Now we see all the reviews and videos of this beta stage sim? With this demanding graphic engine with litte things better than IL-2 1946?

Gimme a break, please! I'm tired of be a fanboy. CoD is a big deception until now. Let's face the true!

[l3uLLDoZeR]

I want to play online...but oh yeah not only is that not possible they turned it into an arcade island battle. I'm not sure this is what any of us had in mind when we thought of multiplayer in CoD.

Now the silly ringed island should be the least of my concerns. I'm tending to believe the people that say this is the next falcon 4.0 more than the "It's gonna be just fine" crowd. If 2-3 years down the road Oleg and team prove me wrong then it will be good for all of us!

[Geier]

After all we were blamed for conspiracy theories...

What official information we have regarding the very poor state of CoD?

CoD is not for free, we will pay for that. However, it seems the game is in gama stage. Who tested the game?? This incredible poor performance was not detected? This is not a conspiracy theory, it's a valid question.

It's so difficult to post some kind of information?? Yes, the game has problems and we are working on it.... but not a word.

[Kikuchiyo]

Originally Posted by Geier

It's so difficult to post some kind of information?? Yes, the game has problems and we are working on it.... but not a word.

Except for the fact that Luthier (Ilya) has been in here several times (the forums not this thread specifically) and pretty much said just that.

[Geier]

Originally Posted by Kikuchiyo

Except for the fact that Luthier (Ilya) has been in here several times (the forums not this thread specifically) and pretty much said just that.

Didn't find it. Sorry then.

But how hard would be a sticky message from him, to stop the panic?

PS. The only thing I have found were some translated messages from russian forums.

[123-Wulf-123]

Then you need to look again. Panicking will get you nowhere.

[Tiger27]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

I spend A LOT of time reading people of Maddox Games and TD talking about "rigid standards"...

Welllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll... Standards about WHAT?!?!?!

What I can clearly see untill now is something very close of the ANCIENT original IL-2 graphic engine, heavy as hell, with a REAL trouble rendering large towns, stuttering in the SAME WAY OLD IL-2 DOES, etc.

Remember the crap talking about mods?

"Ohhhh... this effect mod don't run well! It's not fulfill the rigid standards!"

Now we see all the reviews and videos of this beta stage sim? With this demanding graphic engine with litte things better than IL-2 1946?

Gimme a break, please! I'm tired of be a fanboy. CoD is a big deception until now. Let's face the true!

No probs, your loss see you later, you obviously only read the negative posts and apart from Trees rants there is no evidence at all that this is not a new engine

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Tiger27

No probs, your loss see you later, you obviously only read the negative posts and apart from Trees rants there is no evidence at all that this is not a new engine

I didn't said it's not a "new" engine, just said that a lot of the OLD engine issues remains.

Fanboys didn't read well, I know. And I'm not going anywhere...

[Tiger27]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

I didn't said it's not a "new" engine, just said that a lot of the OLD engine issues remains.

Fanboys didn't read well, I know. And I'm not going anywhere...

I read perfectly well thanks, and it appears you don't have English as your first language(nothing wrong with that) so I may have misunderstood your comments, but the following certainly implies that you have doubts about the newness of this engine

"What I can clearly see untill now is something very close of the ANCIENT original IL-2 graphic engine, heavy as hell, with a REAL trouble rendering large towns, stuttering in the SAME WAY OLD IL-2 DOES, etc."

I'm actually a fanboy of all flight sims, and I'm glad you are not going anywhere as that will be one more purchase, but one thing, how about you make comments based on some facts, that will get this sim fixed up a lot quicker than ranting about old engines etc IMO.