Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2011, 05:35 PM
Ploughman Ploughman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ceinws Escairgeiliog, Cymru
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SG1_Gunkan View Post
I can't disable the Epilepsy filter, at least i can't see the difference.

I use this on config.ini:

[BOB]
AntiEpilepcy =0

But i got the same speed on game. No matter what i change, i got always the same speed. Speed don't means FPS. I got hight FPS but low speed or fluid feeling.
Are you changing the config.ini in steam or the one located C:/Users/<user_name>/Documents/1C/IL2...

According to Adonys you change the one on your C:/Users

- AntiEpilepcy = 0 (right under [BOB] section)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2011, 06:04 PM
SG1_Gunkan SG1_Gunkan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Spain
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ploughman View Post
Are you changing the config.ini in steam or the one located C:/Users/<user_name>/Documents/1C/IL2...

According to Adonys you change the one on your C:/Users

- AntiEpilepcy = 0 (right under [BOB] section)
I did it, i don't have another config.ini. But i think this is not working, at least for my.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2011, 09:34 PM
Thee_oddball Thee_oddball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SG1_Gunkan View Post
I did it, i don't have another config.ini. But i think this is not working, at least for my.
as far as i know its AntiEpilepcy=0 not AntiEpilepcy = 0 and it smoothed the game out for me
__________________
Gigabyte Z68
Intel 2500K (@4.3 ghz)212 CM Cooler
8GB Ram
EVGA 660SC (super clocked) 2GB Vram
CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W
64 GB SSD SATA II HD
WIN7 UL 64BIT
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2011, 09:44 PM
Devastat Devastat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 154
Default

@thee_oddball

I really think it doesn't make a difference. When you write "AntiEpilepcy = 0" after you run the game, it will be condensed automatically in conf.ini to "AntiEpilepcy=0". I still find it hard to believe it makes any difference at all.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2011, 09:49 PM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default

I was under the impression that its the 500mb patch that they released for the russians that suppose to fix (get rid of) the epilepsy filter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2011, 09:52 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggs View Post
I was under the impression that its the 500mb patch that they released for the russians that suppose to fix (get rid of) the epilepsy filter.
Its my understanding that it has not solved the problem with the freezes/stutter and the poor FPS.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-27-2011, 09:59 PM
Komrad Komrad is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 16
Default

My understanding is that the filter itself is not the problem, but rather what MG had to do to allow the filter to work properly with the game.

MG hacking of their own game is what is causing the low FPS not the filter per se.

That is why MG made it clear that the fault for the poor performance lay with their code and that alone.


Bryan.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-27-2011, 10:00 PM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Komrad View Post
My understanding is that the filter itself is not the problem, but rather what MG had to do to allow the filter to work properly with the game.

MG hacking of their own game is what is causing the low FPS not the filter per se.

That is why MG made it clear that the fault for the poor performance lay with their code and that alone.


Bryan.
aww i almost feel bad for the filter now...

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.