Anti-epilepsy filter? - Page 19

mazex · #**181** 03-25-2011, 07:25 AM

The ignorance shown in this thread is really depressing.

Besides, like pointed out by Tree, Ubisoft has been doing this for ALL their titles for three years, the same goes for Sony and many other major publishers. I don't know about EA. Have you noticed bad performance in all the other titles by Ubisoft or Sony for the last three years? They apparently managed to pass the tests without loosing performance somehow, with some exceptions like Wipeout HD for PS3 that Sony stopped and sent back to the developers before releasing it for not passing the same tests we talk about here - in 2008!

http://www.computerandvideogames.com...pilepsy-tests/

I sure hope that MG can address their performance issues, just like the other developers have done.

Targ · #**182** 03-25-2011, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by combatdudePL

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/t...9/m/6751022719

Look at the bottom of thread

Often it seems to take a week or longer for anyone to reply to her requests for information.

Let's hope we hear something much sooner.

T}{OR · #**183** 03-25-2011, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tvrdi

do we have vids showing filter on and OFF? I would like to know whats this all about...visually...

seconded

Targ · #**184** 03-25-2011, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazex

The ignorance shown in this thread is really depressing.

Besides, like pointed out by Tree, Ubisoft has been doing this for ALL their titles for three years, the same goes for Sony and many other major publishers. I don't know about EA. Have you noticed bad performance in all the other titles by Ubisoft or Sony for the last three years? They apparently managed to pass the tests without loosing performance somehow.

I sure hope that MG can address their performance issues, just like the other developers have done.

I assume you have a link with some good information backing this claim up? Or is it that we are simply to ignorant for you to provide some links to back your claim up?

mazex · #**185** 03-25-2011, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Targ

I assume you have a link with some good information backing this claim up? Or is it that we are simply to ignorant for you to provide some links to back your claim up?

Edited my post above with a link, you can sure find more yourself - my guess about the reason there are not so many to find are because this is handled internally, who would like to post stuff like that in public? I guess MANY developers have got their games back to re engineer them the last three years - but WHY would the developers or the publishers want to make that a public discussion like this? It sure as hell strikes back at themselves (both parties).

csThor · #**186** 03-25-2011, 07:41 AM

The decision makers at 1C really need to take a long hard look at ways to put their boot up Uselesshit's collective ass and kick em so hard that they reach a geostatic orbit. This "publisher" has caused nothing but hassle since they bought BlueByte over ten years ago ... and this abonimation is the latest straw. WTF is Uselesshit serving during its board meetings? LSD?

#**187** 03-25-2011, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHB68

And your UBISOFT fanboy jabbering is unbearable. As a cheated Silent Hunter V Customer I don't give a XXXX what UBISOFT has done or not ! I considered to break my personal UBISOFT boycott to support Oleg and his team, but if there is no fix until Mar 31st I won't buy the game....with tears in my eyes !

This is a joke post right? Mazex isn't a Ubisoft fanboy, your dealing with the facts here, Cliffs Of Dover did not meet the required Eplipesy standard that Ubisoft amongst others have imposed for the last 3 years, this is not Ubisofts fault, the dev's have screwed up, either that, or its an excuse for such a poor running game. Given the fact that they refused to show us any 'in game' footage despite repeated request from myself and others then it would appear that its a cover up for a poor running game. IMHO.

kendo65 · #**188** 03-25-2011, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazex

The ignorance shown in this thread is really depressing.

Besides, like pointed out by Tree, Ubisoft has been doing this for ALL their titles for three years, the same goes for Sony and many other major publishers. I don't know about EA. Have you noticed bad performance in all the other titles by Ubisoft or Sony for the last three years? They apparently managed to pass the tests without loosing performance somehow, with some exceptions like Wipeout HD for PS3 that Sony stopped and sent back to the developers before releasing it for not passing the same tests we talk about here - in 2008!

http://www.computerandvideogames.com...pilepsy-tests/

I sure hope that MG can address their performance issues, just like the other developers have done.

The only thing I'd say in response is that apparently Ubi were only signed up fairly late. So, if they came onboard late last year it is entirely feasible that the situation is as described - and this whole issue was foisted on the devs at last minute.

Vasilj_Mitu · #**189** 03-25-2011, 07:43 AM

what bothers me here is why the hell did the MG guys kept their mouth tightly shut about that AE filter nonsense until the game was out in Russia?

Jarsalla · #**190** 03-25-2011, 07:45 AM

Ubi had sacks of gold in it's hands, but now it is slowly turning into pile of poo.

Still looking forward to see videos in youtube where someone actually flys the released sim and not some beta. After that I'll make conclusions whether or not I'm going to cancel my pre-order.