![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() ,probably has more flight time in a WW11 fighter than anyone else ,[maybe John Romain excepted] and you call him a twat and biased. If you actually listen to what he says ,they are facts. Cockpit is small/cramped Canopy is heavy and difficult to get open [Black 6 crashed and the pilot asked the fire crews NOT to cut the airframe to release him] as he could'nt get out any other way had to be lifted. http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org...es/lrg1545.jpg He praises the controls,throttles,panel and the layout so not really totally biased against at all. I think you need to listen more carefully and make a less biased statement yourself. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
we need his height and weight
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The guy pointed out bad things while on the Spit too, so not completely biased, but the fact that he seems really big and tall doesnt necessarily represent what most 109 pilots felt while inside that cockpit.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Modern era western civilians, used to have everything at their disposal judge war machines from an old era......
![]() I bet was more comfortable in the pit of the 109 than it was in the frozen trenches in Stalingrad. We can argue and comment all we want eighty years later in a peaceful era. Comfort don't mean crap in war. The Russians flew with open canopies in frigid winter and didn't whine like this guy. Back then people were not used to be pampered like we are today, on top of that it was war, and in war you use what they give you the best you can. They did mighty good throughout the war in those "oh my God this is cramped" Bf109 cockpits. For the ammount of time the 109 had fuel that pit was plenty comfortable. With this whiny generation of pampered crybabies, God help us if we have to fight a real war, against a real enemy. ![]() Last edited by Jaws2002; 03-03-2011 at 04:10 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You guys are incredible. In what way was he being a cry baby? The cockpit is very cramped compared to the Spit and the canopy is dangerous in a crash situation with very poor visibility. He said he would much RATHER go to war in a Spit which is a perfectly reasonable argument given these issues. He isn't saying the 109 is a hopeless war machine - just that he'd rather have more room, much better visibility and a better chance of surviving a ground flip if the choice was his to make. You can't argue with the facts. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
In the case of a ground flip actually the extremely solid frame cannopy of the 109 was a lot safer than most late war bubble sliding canopies. You analyse fighting machines based on their fighting qualities, not based on pilot comfort. Pilot comfort on a short range fighter are way down the list of requirenments. There are plenty fighting qualities of the 109 (climb, dive, negative G, Cannons, small, hard to see) that make the 109 of that era a very dangerous oponent for anything in the skies. This is like some of the "reviews" you see online for fighting guns today. Oh, the stock doesn't look good, is not very ergonomic, the plastic feels cheap, the collor is off...... ![]() Last edited by Jaws2002; 03-03-2011 at 04:36 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're suggesting that forum members with zero flying experience listen to the facts given by an expert on the matter? I think you've got the wrong forum.
Quote:
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To keep this thread from ending in the gutter
some posts have been removed to keep on topic and make for easier reading. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Also discomfort increases fatigue. Fatigue increases the chance of errors when operating in stressful situations. Cheers! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW In the video he describes himself as lightly built.
Cheers! |
![]() |
|
|