![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its been posted a few times I guess.Core i5 750? @2.7ghz 4gb of ram radeon 5670 and 32 bit os.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yep, I saw the specs here.
But interesting is the frame rate they are getting. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very, very promising. I can't wait to get my hands on this bad boy. I think I'll just slap a $150 quad core in my existing rig, it should run this fine. By the time they get the dynamic weather running, I should be able to afford a significant upgrade. I'm not really worried about the FPS at all, I'm sure 1200MB of frame buffer will do it, if it moves at all with 512.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
At 11:02 the tail of that bomber is not properly modeled ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I almost feel drowned.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow the end of that last video makes me feel reassured about how the game will run on my system. Seems that the frame rate choppiness over land is due to an underpowered video card for those settings. thanks for posting it.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Resolutions make a huge difference - especially with AA, because the higher the res, the higher the AA cost at the same setting, if you go from like 1600x1080->1920x1200 and have 4x AA on its going to probably halve your framerate. Although it depends on many many factors (hardware, software etc), but think of stuff like AF and AA as a multiplier on your resolution. Last edited by Heliocon; 02-14-2011 at 09:12 AM. |
![]() |
|
|